Accept luxury SUVs?
The defendant denied it in court.
It is understood that the defendant Lu is 54 years old this year. He used to be the director of Xincheng Police Station of Gutingshan Public Security Bureau in Liuzhou, the deputy director of the street office of Yanghe New Industrial Zone Management Committee and the director of the land acquisition office of Yanghe New Industrial Zone. Before the incident, he was the director of the Safety Production Supervision Administration of Yanghe New Industrial Zone. On April 13 this year, Lu was taken compulsory measures by Liujiang District People's Procuratorate for allegedly accepting bribes.
The public prosecution agency alleged that during the period from 20 1 1 to 20 16, the defendant Lu took advantage of his position to help Qin, the director of a village Committee in Yufeng District and the general manager of an earthwork engineering company in Liuzhou (handled separately), to undertake projects such as soil clearing and brick laying in Yang and New Industrial Zone. 2065438+June 2005, the defendant Lu received a jeep herder off-road vehicle worth 560,000 yuan.
The public prosecution agency claimed that the defendant Lu, as a staff member of the state organs, used his position to seek benefits for others and accepted bribes from others, with a huge amount, and his behavior should be investigated for criminal responsibility for accepting bribes.
In the face of the accusation, the defendant Lu refused to plead guilty, arguing that he did not use his position to seek illegitimate interests for Qin during his tenure as the director of the land acquisition office of Yanghe New Industrial Zone. Lu also said that the economic exchange between him and Qin was a normal loan relationship. He admitted that the off-road vehicle involved was paid in advance by a gang, and the card was also called for help, because his money was used for borrowing, and there was not so much money at home for the time being.
Defendant Lu also argued that the car purchase money had been returned to Zou twice, once for 430,000 yuan and once for 6,543.38+0.8 million yuan. However, the testimony of the party Qin provided by the public prosecution agency in court shows that Lu did not return the car purchase price.
The client sent a note to the detention center?
Accused of attempted collusion
In court, the public prosecution agency also accused the defendant, Ye, who had entrusted a man with him to take out a note during his stay in the detention center in an attempt to retract his confession. According to witness Yemou, on April 2 1 this year, when he was ready to pack up and leave the detention center, Lumou, who was in the same prison room, asked him to help him get a piece of paper out, saying that he asked his friend to help him get some clothes in. Later, Yemou hid this note and took it out of the detention center.
Yemou said that he didn't read the specific content of the note, but made several phone calls according to the phone number written on the outermost part of the note, and finally contacted a man to give the note to the other party. So the man gave him 500 yuan money. As we all know, whether Lu took a note to Ye out of the detention center or Ye handed the note to another man, it was photographed by the surveillance camera.
In addition, the investigators also extracted two photos from Lu's son's mobile phone, which were related to the note brought by Lu Tuoren. Xiao Lu's testimony shows that on April 22nd, a stranger added him as a friend through WeChat, and then sent these two photos. After sending the photo, the other party blacked him out.
The public prosecution agency said that the defendant Lu asked Ye to send a note from the detention center, which was transferred by others and handed over to the contents of the note. His behavior seriously violated the regulations of the detention center and was collusion. In the face of this accusation by the public prosecution agency, the defendant Lu firmly denied it. He argued that he did not write a suicide note and did not ask anyone to help him take it out of the detention center. However, Lu's defense lawyer argued that the delivery of the note had nothing to do with the case and did not affect the investigation behavior of the investigation organ. It can only be said that Lu violated the rules, regardless of whether he fabricated or concealed the facts.
In sentencing, the public prosecution agency suggested that the defendant be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than seven years for accepting bribes, and be fined or confiscated. Defendant Lu and his defense lawyer insisted on not guilty. At present, the case is still under further investigation.