Lawyer Huang Ma couldn't appear in court and was fired. The court apologized! What is the fault of the court in this matter?

Today is July 18th. According to the latest report, a female lawyer surnamed Song in Huangpu District of Guangzhou has been working in Guangdong for two days, but she was given a yellow code because of the epidemic. Although she tested negative for nucleic acid twice in a row, her travel was restricted. However, two days later, she has a lawsuit to fight in Guangming District, Shenzhen. In the end, although Ms. Song came to the court door and could not enter because of the health code problem, it can be said that it was very excessive. So what's wrong with the court in this matter? First, she completely ignored or even failed to restore the message and communication intention of Lawyer Song, which is a manifestation of the negligence of the court. According to reports, Ms. Song immediately called the Guangming District People's Court in Shenzhen after learning that her health code had changed, and contacted each other through various channels such as WeChat applet news, WeChat official account news and private messages. But the result is a very perfunctory reply, or more like a meaningless automatic reply. Ms. Song's request is also very simple, that is, she hopes to switch to online trial. Now many courts have adopted this form, and Shenzhen Guangming District Court has no reason to refuse, and this perfunctory is the embodiment of the court's negligence and incorrect attitude.

Second, it is an extremely disrespectful behavior to withdraw the lawsuit directly without knowing the whole story, whether it is for lawyer Song or his client. Seeing that Lawyer Song didn't come, the court, as the presiding judge of the court, was obliged to find out what had happened, but the court directly chose to withdraw the lawsuit. This is really ridiculous. For this lawsuit, Ms. Song and her client have prepared a lot of things. Moreover, the parties must have major interests. If it is migrant workers or other people, it will harm the interests of the people. This kind of direct withdrawal is lazy and disrespectful.

I hope this kind of thing will happen less in the future!