The mode of public prosecution opinions on contract fraud is as follows:
Hello, the indictment of contract fraud is as follows for your reference:
Presiding Judge: The case of the defendants * * * * * was heard today in accordance with the law. According to the provisions of Article 153 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 15 of the Organic Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the prosecutor * * * is appointed by the Loudi Municipal People's Procuratorate to appear in court as a state prosecutor, support public prosecution and perform legal supervision duties according to law. After investigation in court, the opinion of the public prosecution agency is as follows: the criminal facts of * * and * * have been clearly identified in the indictment and confirmed by the court investigation today. The facts are clear, the evidence is conclusive, and the defendant has confessed without proof. However, in order to fully expose the criminal nature of this case and its harm to society, it is necessary to further explore this case and ask the court to severely punish the defendant and protect public and private property. The crime of fraud is an act of obtaining public and private property with the purpose of illegal possession, using fraudulent means such as fictional facts and concealing the truth. The so-called fiction is to fabricate a fact that does not exist to win the trust of the deceived. To hide the truth is to cover up some objective facts that have been cheated. If you know this fact by deception, you will not "voluntarily" hand over the property to the defendant. The defendant Ma and the defendant committed fraud in the name of raising quails, and their actions have constituted fraud and should be punished according to law. The prosecution put forward the following opinions on the defendant * * *: 1. The defense claimed that the defendant * * * intended to lead the local people to get rich, but it fully proved that the defendant had systematically lured the local villagers to raise quails through the leased premises from the beginning and promised to recycle them at a high price.
Second, when the defendant * * * escaped, he called * * and said that letting him take the money to escape also fully proved that he cheated other people's property. Third, the witness * * * suggested that the defendant * * * had no contact with other people in the company during the months of raising quail. It can be seen that this company is actually an empty shell, which is used by the defendant to deceive the villagers. Now I would like to express the following opinions on the defendant * * *: 1. The defendant * * * played an important role in this case. He helped * * * to raise quails, creating false appearances to deceive local villagers to raise quails. Second, the defendant * * * knew the real purpose of the defendant * * * to raise quail from beginning to end, but he never stopped it, indicating that he also agreed to cheat. Third, when quail was about to grow up, it also escaped under the command of the defendant. So its behavior plays a particularly important role in the whole process. According to Article 266 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the actions of the defendants * * * * and * * * should be punished as fraud, and the defendant Ma is a recidivist and should be severely punished. To sum up, the defendants * * * and * * are young and promising, and should create wealth by their own hands, instead of deceiving those kind and simple villagers. That more than 10,000 yuan may be the income of local villagers for one year or even two years, but it was cheated by two defendants with full interests. During the trial of this case, the defendant confessed his criminal facts and asked the court to give a fair judgment according to the criminal facts, nature and circumstances of the defendant.