"Be 73" should refer to being 73** by law
The 73rd Amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law, which has caused widespread controversy, stipulates: "Designated residence In the case of residential surveillance, the reasons for residential surveillance and the place of execution shall be informed within 24 hours after the execution of residential surveillance. Notify the person under residential surveillance of the place of execution and execution location, except for those who cannot be notified or are suspected of crimes endangering national security or terrorist activities. If the notification may hinder the investigation of a crime or terrorist activity, the family members of the person under residential surveillance shall be notified of the reasons for residential surveillance and the place where residential surveillance will be implemented within 24 hours after the residential surveillance is implemented. "
This article stipulates: "The reasons for residential surveillance and the location where residential surveillance will be implemented shall be notified to the family members of the person under residential surveillance within 24 hours after the residential surveillance is implemented.
The implication is: "If it is impossible to notify the family members of the person under residential surveillance, or the person under residential surveillance is suspected of crimes endangering national security or terrorist activities, or notifying the family members may hinder the investigation, no notification is required. "
Many posts on the Internet believe that such regulations imply the expansion of the powers of the public security and other investigative agencies and neglect the protection of the rights of criminal suspects.
In recent years, there have been many cases of lawyers being caught committing perjury, and many lawyers and scholars have called for this regulation to be revised. Some members of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, including Tsinghua University professor Zhou Guangquan, suggested that the crime of perjury should be equally applied to all litigants, including the public prosecutor and the law.
This issue is relatively complex and has a lot of background. You can check out 73 related articles.