Guangzhou haibawang foods co., ltd
Judgment document
Details of the judgment document
G moumou and Guangzhou haibawang food co., ltd. civil judgment of first instance on labor dispute.
Release date: 2021-05-11
file header
Conghua District People's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province
civil judgment
(2020) Guangdong 0 1 17 Early Republic of China 528 1
Plaintiff: G Moumou, born on, Han nationality, living in Cangzhou City, Hebei Province.
Authorized Agent: Y Moumou, lawyer of Guangdong Taoce Law Firm.
Authorized Agent: W Moumou, intern lawyer of Guangdong Taoce Law Firm.
Defendant: Guangzhou Haibawang Food Co., Ltd., domicile: Conghua, Guangzhou.
Legal Representative: Gao Huijun, general manager.
Authorized Agent: H Moumou, lawyer of Guangdong Shenye Law Firm.
Authorized Agent: L Moumou, employee of this company.
Litigation record
The labor dispute case of plaintiff G Moumou v. defendant Guangzhou Haibawang Food Co., Ltd. was put on file by our hospital on June 65438+1October 65438+June 25, 2020, and the summary procedure was applied to open trial by Judge Lu Shubin on June 65438+1October 25, 2020. Plaintiff G, his litigation agents Y and W, and defendants Guangzhou Haibawang Food Co., Ltd. H and L attended the proceedings. The case has now been closed.
Factual basis
The plaintiff brought a lawsuit to our hospital: 1. The defendant paid the plaintiff compensation for work-related injuries and compensation for illegal termination of the labor contract totaling 448,468.6 yuan (see the expense list for details); 2. The litigation costs in this case shall be borne by the defendant.
Facts and reasons: The plaintiff joined the defendant company on June 5, 2009 +065438+, and was accidentally overwhelmed by the machine when he went to work on August 4, 20 18, resulting in many injuries. On October 26th, 20 18/KLOC-0, the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Conghua District recognized the plaintiff as a work-related injury. On March/0/day, 2065438, Guangzhou Labor Ability Appraisal Committee assessed the plaintiff's degree of labor dysfunction as Grade 7, and the period of work stoppage with pay was 20/0/8 to February/0/3, 2065438. On May 1 1 day, 2020, Guangzhou Labor Ability Appraisal Committee confirmed that the period from May 2065438 +09 1654381October 14 to April 8, 2020 "was not a recurrence of work-related injuries. On July 3, 2020, Guangzhou Labor Ability Appraisal Committee reexamined and appraised the plaintiff's disability level 7. The plaintiff was admitted to the hospital four times respectively. I was hospitalized in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University for the first time and recovered in Guangdong Rehabilitation Hospital for the last three times. On April 8, 2020, the defendant ignored the fact that the plaintiff was not well and asked him to leave the hospital. Unable to pay the high treatment fee, the plaintiff was forced to leave hospital. After the plaintiff was discharged from the hospital, the defendant asked the plaintiff to negotiate the resumption of work. On May 20, 2020, the plaintiff informed the defendant through WeChat that he was unwell and could not walk alone for consultation, and requested to continue hospitalization. The defendant refused and dismissed him on May 2 1 day on the grounds that the plaintiff was absent from work for more than three days.