Why was the case of killing his wife and son in Guizhou sent back for retrial?

Li, a cadre of Guizhou Ironmaking Factory, has a wife and a son, but he has a lover relationship with Meng Mohong, a female worker of the factory, because of many miscarriages. In 2000, his wife discovered his extramarital affairs and filed for divorce, but she did not divorce after being retained. During this period, Meng Mohong threatened and harassed Li Jinxing and made radical remarks. Later, he scolded Li's wife on the phone, and his wife was so tired that she took her to court. 200 1 1 19 The two went to court and their relationship reached an impasse. Until March 2, 20065438+0/day, Li reported that his wife and son had disappeared inexplicably the day before, and claimed that Meng Mohong was a major suspect. Through on-site investigation, the police found blood on Li's ex-wife's floor, mop and Meng Mohong's dormitory floor, and extracted Meng Mohong's fingerprint at the door of Li's bedroom.

The first trial found that Li strangled his wife and son in the early hours of the report, and together with Meng Mohong, he dismembered his wife and children and threw them into the blast furnace of the iron factory. On June 5438+1October 65438+February, 2004, the High Court sentenced Li to death for intentional homicide, with a two-year suspension. But during Li Yu's imprisonment, he always claimed that he was innocent. His defense lawyer believes that there are many doubts in this case, and there is no objective evidence to prove it except the defendant's repeated statements.

Li claimed that he didn't kill anyone, nor did he dismember or destroy the body. The murderer in this case is Ma Moufang, and he filed a complaint on this ground. 20 16 the higher people's court considered that the reasons met the conditions of reaffirmation and decided to retry. On June 65438+1October 65438+February 2004, the High Court revoked the original judgment and sent it back to the Intermediate People's Court for retrial. The high court said that the original first-instance undocumented person issued a certificate, the appraisal conclusion was not publicized, and it was not re-appraised. There were doubts about Li's crime of intentional homicide.

On September 24, 2020, the High Court retried Li's intentional homicide case, during which Li's defense lawyer submitted new evidence, including a set of 12. However, the prosecution believes that this evidence does not prove that Li is not the murderer. In view of the complexity of the case, no verdict has been announced.