Ordinary criminal cases are more complicated than civil cases, so most of them have to be tried in court. Therefore, both the prosecution and the defense need to submit an indictment and a defense, and then they may need written materials such as public prosecution opinions. Defending the crime of intentional injury Dear presiding judge, judge and people's assessor: The law firm of * * accepted the entrustment of the client according to law and appointed me as the defender of the defendant * * suspected of intentional injury. Defenders have a more comprehensive understanding of the case by meeting with the defendant, consulting relevant file materials and combining the trial just now. According to the facts and laws, the following defense opinions are put forward: the defender has no objection to the crime of intentional injury accused by the public prosecution agency, but in terms of sentencing, there are the following statutory or discretionary circumstances in this case: First, the victim has certain faults in the occurrence of this case. This case is caused by the generational behavior between the defendant and the victim with the same surname Dong. According to the customs of China, this is normal. If the victim disagrees with the defendant's point of view, he might as well laugh it off. However, in the face of the defendant who just turned 2 1 year-old at the time of the crime, the victim proposed to solve it by "one-on-one" and "wrestling", resulting in injuries to the youthful defendant. It is worth mentioning that the victim was 42 years old at the time of the crime. Compared with the defendant who is more than 20 years younger than him, he has much more experience in dealing with people. If he had been a little more tolerant, he could have settled the dispute peacefully, instead of taking excessive actions such as abuse, I believe this injury case would not have happened. Second, the defendant's criminal behavior is subjectively vicious and less harmful to society. According to the contents reflected in the case file and today's trial, it can be seen that this case was caused by the daily chores between workers and the improper handling of contradictions by both sides. The defendant did not intentionally harm the victim before the personnel, and its nature should be a temporary passion crime, with relatively little subjective malignancy and social harm. Third, the defendant has no criminal record, is an occasional and first-time offender, and has a good attitude of pleading guilty. Stimulated by the victim's excessive language and behavior, the defendant hurt the victim on impulse, resulting in such consequences today. After the crime, the defendant did not leave the crime scene immediately. Later, the victim asked him to discuss compensation for medical expenses, but the amount of compensation required was obviously too high. In this case, he only objected to the amount of compensation and did not deliberately evade responsibility. He regretted his behavior very much and expressed his hope to compensate the victims to the maximum extent. When the defender met, the defendant repeatedly expressed regret. He said that he was sorry for the victims and their families and hoped that the court would handle it lightly. Based on the above reasons, I hope that the court can fully consider the fact that the social harm of this case is not great and the defendant's subjective malignancy is small, and comprehensively consider the defendant's criminal circumstances and repentance performance, and give the defendant a lighter punishment. To the Defender of the People's Court of * * City: Lawyer of * * Law Firm * * 201March 18 The above is a model defense for intentional injury, for reference only, and I hope it can help you.
Legal objectivity:
Presiding Judge: According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Lawyers Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), Hunan XXX Law Firm accepted the entrustment of the close relatives of the criminal suspect XXX and appointed me as his defender for the crime of intentional injury. After investigation