Administrative adjudication
(20 15) Zhong No.3 00756
The plaintiff, Huibang Law Service Office, Huishan District, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, has its domicile atNo. 1 Shishi East Road, Shitangwan, Luoshe Town, Huishan District, Wuxi City.
Miao Jianping, legal representative, director.
The plaintiff Wuxi Huishan Huibang Law Service Office (hereinafter referred to as Huibang Law) filed an administrative lawsuit against People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Ministry of Justice), requesting the court to confirm that the administrative act of the Ministry of Justice not asking Huibang Law to explain its legality, rationality and applicability was illegal. It also ordered the Ministry of Justice to explain whether its order. 19 and reply number. Sifu (2002) 12 is applicable to law firms and their practitioners who are transformed into partnerships within 10, and continues to explain its legality, rationality and applicability.
In our hospital's view, when a party files an administrative lawsuit, it should meet the conditions for prosecution stipulated in the Administrative Procedure Law. The Ministry of Justice has formulated the Working Rules of Township Legal Service Offices and its reply. (2002) 12. Huibang Law requires the Ministry of Justice to explain the legality, rationality and applicability of the above two, which belongs to administrative consultation. Administrative consultation is not an actionable administrative act. According to the provisions of Paragraph 4 of Article 49 and Article 85 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, the ruling is as follows:
The plaintiff Huibang Law Service Office in Huishan District, Wuxi City was not filed.
If you refuse to accept this ruling, you may appeal to the Beijing Higher People's Court within 10 days from the date of service of this ruling.
Judge Gu Shaoyong represents Judge and Judge Wu.
201September 5 16
Staff Wang Bin