Professors and doctoral supervisors
Director, Evidence Law Research Center, Tsinghua University Law School
academic degree
1992- 1996, China university of political science and law, LLB.
1996- 1999, Master of Laws, Graduate School of China University of Political Science and Law.
200 1-2002, LLM, University of Warwick, UK.
1999-2002, Graduate School of China University of Political Science and Law, Doctor of Law.
Still a relatively young teacher, full of energy.
Please see the official link of Tsinghua University:
/publish/law/3563/2010/20122019520179121787/20/kloc-0.
Baidu Encyclopedia:
/view/ 100 1350.htm
The following quotation is from the official introduction of Tsinghua University.
academic achievement
(1) project
1. Criminal Procedure Law (4th Edition) (legal ladder), Law Press, 20 13.
2. Essentials of Criminal Procedure Law (lecture hall for famous jurists), Peking University Publishing House, 20 13.
3. Understanding Criminal Procedure in China (English textbook), Tsinghua University Publishing House, 20 1 1 year; American seahorse press, 20 12.
4. China Criminal Procedure and China Society, 20 10, Peking University Publishing House.
5. The System and Spirit of Evidence Law, 20 10, Peking University Publishing House.
6. Criminal Procedure Law (Third Edition) (2 1 Century Law Textbook), Law Press, 2008.
7. Jury Trial and Confrontation Litigation, Taipei, Sanmin Bookstore, 2004.
8. Criminal Procedure Law (Second Edition) (2 1 Century Law Textbook), Law Press, 2004.
9. Criminal Procedure Law (First Edition) (2 1 Century Law Textbook), Law Press, 2003.
10. Freedom of Silence, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 200 1.
(2) thesis
1. The System and Perfection of Criminal Compulsory Measures, Law Research No.3, 20 12.
2. The Transformation of National Ideology and Procedural Mode: China Criminal Procedure Law and Its Revision, Tsinghua China Law Review, 20 12.
3. On the Significance of Presumption of Innocence and the Improvement of Criminal Procedure Law, Forum on Politics and Law,No. 1 issue, 20 12.
4. On the Best Evidence Rule, Comparative Law Research No.6, 20 1 1.
5. Criminal Procedure Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights and Exclusion Rules of Illegal Evidence —— Focusing on the Fourth Amendment of the US Federal Constitution, Tsinghua Law, No.4, 20 1 1.
6. Witness Appearing in Court and Defendant's Pledge Guarantee, China Social Sciences, No.2, 20 10.
7. Formation and characteristics of adversarial criminal procedure —— On the reform of criminal judicial adversarial system in China, Tsinghua Law No.2, 20 10.
8. The right of an eye for an eye-A study of pledge, Comparative Law Research,No. 1 issue, 20 10.
9. "Can the government force citizens to be more free? Re-discussion on non-judicial custody and its legitimacy under China's administrative regulations, in Tsinghua China Law Review, 20 10, Volume 2.
10. Construction and Reflection of Criminal Trial Level System, Law Research, No.3, 2009.
1 1. Relevance in American Federal Rules of Evidence, Global Law Review, No.6, 2009.
12. Decriminalization, Procedural Rule of Law and Predictability of Law —— A legal perspective centered on the yellow disc case, Tsinghua Law, No.4, 2009.
13. Privilege Rule: American System and Practice, Evidence Science, No.4, 2009.
14. Rules of Witness Testimony in Anglo-American Evidence Law, Comparative Law Research, No.6, 2008.
15. Compilation of Evidence Rules-USA: Law Making and Its Enlightenment to Evidence Legislation in China, Politics and Law Forum, No.6, 2008.
16. Hearsay law: history, principles and development trend, Tsinghua Law, No.4, 2008.
17. arrest as punishment: the abuse of arrest in People's Republic of China (PRC). Society: International Journal of Penal Science, 2008, Vol. 10,No. 1.
18. Expert Testimony System in Anglo-American Evidence Law and Its Challenges, Global Law Review, No.4, 2007.
19. Rules and Basic Principles of Character Evidence in Anglo-American Law, Tsinghua Law, No.2, 2007.
20. How is unjust imprisonment regulated?
2 1. How does the principle of balance eliminate human rights? Taking Article 93 as an example, On Philosophy of Law and Sociology of Law, Peking University Publishing House, 2006.
22. Is Evidence Law? An investigation centered on the object of study, Journal of Politics and Law, No.3, 2005.
23. The success or failure of jury transplantation and its enlightenment, in Comparative Law Research,No. 1 2005.
24. A Historical and Philosophical Survey of Anglo-American Evidence Law, Chinese and Foreign Law, No.3, 2004.
25. Is the jury in decline? -Interpretation of the Development Trend of Jury in Contemporary Britain and America, Modern Law, No.3, 2004.
26. On the Theoretical Basis of Evidence Law, Law Research,No. 1 2004.
Plea bargaining should be postponed, Law,No. 12, 2003.
28. Towards an Independent and Fair Judiciary —— Comment on Judicial Reform, Chinese and Foreign Law, No.6, 2000.
29. On the Privilege against Self-incrimination, in Comparative Law Research No.2, 1999.
30. Re-discussion on the Philosophical Basis of Free Evaluation of Evidence System, Comparative Law Research No.2, 1998.
(3) Prose
1. The objective obligation of prosecutors needs the support of theory and practice, Procuratorate Daily, September 23, 2009.
2. The Restoration of Japanese Jury and Its Enlightenment to China, Southern Weekend, July 2009.
3. The official position and resources make scholars stumble, Legal Daily, June 24, 2009.
4. Severe punishment for disorder has nothing to do with judicial activism, Legal Daily, August 3, 20091.
5. The judgment of the court should stand the scrutiny of the law-English letters are not in line with the laws of China, Legal Daily, March 4, 2009.
6. The procedure of sentencing debate should be popularized and improved, Legal Daily, June 2009.
7. The crime of contempt of court should not be established in China for the time being, Legal Daily, 65438+2009122 October.
8. Defending the right of an eye for an eye, Southern Weekend, 2008,165438+1October 27th.
9. What should lawyers strive for? Lawyer China, 2008.
10. incidental civil action and protection of criminal victims' rights, procuratorial daily, may 2006 18.
1 1. "Why should the court ask for instructions when deciding a case", Southern Weekend, May 27, 2004.
12. "People's courts evade the law as a whole-on the case of a judge murdering the president", Sohu Review, June 2003 10.
13. How long can we be imprisoned? Southern weekend, 1999, 1 1.2.
14. The Theory of Knowing and the Theory of Not Knowing, Southern Weekend,199865438+February 18.
15. What did the court say? Southern weekend, 65438+September 25th, 0998.
16. What interests should judges represent? Southern weekend,1June 26, 998.
17. Why not dig the roots of the poisonous tree? Southern weekend,1June 5, 998.