I am an undergraduate majoring in law. I want to take the postgraduate entrance examination and take the judicial examination. I would like to ask my predecessors, which is more promising, the Master

I am an undergraduate majoring in law. I want to take the postgraduate entrance examination and take the judicial examination. I would like to ask my predecessors, which is more promising, the Master of Laws or the Judicial Examination? If you want to make great progress on the road of law, you still have to take the master of law exam. It is best to take an examination of famous schools and follow the famous teachers.

If you just want to be a lawyer or a judge, then you can take the judicial examination.

I am also a master of laws myself, because I don't want to be a lawyer.

You say you don't like abstract and empty things, but you don't have to go to graduate school. It may be more suitable for you to pass the judicial examination or take the civil service examination as a judge and find a partner firm to become a legal lawyer.

I am introverted, and I think it's good to stay in school as a teacher in the future. If you are too lazy to practice, you will be exhausted.

Read your question carefully. What you heard is correct. I think LLM's study is of little help to practice, and it is more suitable for academic research or being a teacher in the future. However, what I studied was not the direction of civil and commercial affairs, but the comparative criminal law of the Institute of Criminal Justice. Maybe those who study civil and commercial affairs will have different views from me.

After passing the judicial examination, don't waste your time on boring graduate studies. The teaching of graduate students is really not business-oriented, and it is of little help to the judicial examination. It is all multiple-choice questions.

Finally, I hope everything goes well with you.