July 3, for? The duck of colleague Wang was taken away and eaten? Regarding the incident, the relevant person in charge of the Propaganda Department of Xixian County, Xinyang City, Henan Province replied to the upstream journalist that the public security has been involved in the investigation and will definitely handle it properly. At 0: 00 on July 3, actress Wang released a duck-seeking notice in Weibo, saying that her colleagues would join the filming and put her pet duck? Kiki? Sent back to his hometown in Xixian County, Henan Province, and taken care of by his mother. On the afternoon of the 2nd, the pet duck was taken away near the snack bar opened by my colleague's mother. The lost pet ducks have bibs, shoes and diapers. At 8: 00 a.m. on July 3, actor Wang Fa Weibo said: My friend who lives near Country Garden, Wenhua Road, Xixian County, Henan Province, helped me to see if I could contact the lady below. The duck in her hand is my colleague's pet and brother Park's good friend Gigi! Because my colleagues filmed with me, I sent it back to my hometown for my mother to take care of. If you can find her, please convey it to me, and I will thank you with ten sets of Peking Duck fresh-keeping suits with the same physique. 10 or so, Wang Faweibo said that the duck catcher had been found. But? Kiki? Is no longer in this world. In the afternoon, the police said that the duck catcher had been found, and the pet duck was taken to the farmer's market to be slaughtered and plucked, but it had not been eaten yet. Due to the duck catcher or suspected theft, the local police are evaluating the damage of pet ducks and will deal with the duck catcher according to the identification results. The incident sparked heated discussion. Some netizens believe that this kind of behavior belongs to theft; Some netizens think that celebrity effect and star aura will affect the handling of cases. The lawyer said: it is obviously theft for a duck catcher to take away a duck that he knows does not belong to him. But it is worth noting that in the above terms, it is determined? A lot? It should be based on the judgment of ordinary people. Because most people don't think ducks have much value, catching ducks may not constitute theft. The duck catcher's behavior obviously infringes on the civil rights and interests of the duck owner, so the duck catcher should bear the responsibility of compensating for the losses, and the amount of compensation should refer to the actual value of the duck. At the same time, if the death of the pet duck does cause great mental damage to the duck owner, the duck owner can ask the duck catcher for compensation for mental damage. ?
?