In public security cases, it often involves the identification of the injured party, and the identification of the injury is also for the public security organs to better identify the case. You know, there is a time limit for public security organs to handle cases, so is injury identification a time limit for handling cases? The following small series will give you a specific talk on this issue.
First, is the injury identification included in the time limit for handling cases?
Article 99 of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment stipulates: "The time limit for public security organs to handle public security cases shall not exceed 30 days from the date of acceptance; If the case is serious and complicated, it may be extended for 30 days with the approval of the public security organ at the next higher level. In order to find out the case, the time limit for identification is not included in the time limit for handling public security cases. "
The "appraisal period" here refers to the period from the date when the public security organ submits the appraisal to the date when the appraisal institution makes the appraisal conclusion and delivers it to the public security organ. Public security organs should effectively improve the efficiency of handling cases and ensure that public security cases are settled within the statutory time limit. If the case cannot be closed within the statutory time limit due to objective reasons such as the escape of the offender in violation of public security management, the public security organ shall continue to investigate and collect evidence, and make a decision in a timely manner according to law, and shall not stop investigating and collecting evidence because of exceeding the statutory time limit for handling cases. If the violator of public security administration is at large, which makes it impossible to find out the facts of the case and collect enough evidence to close the case, the public security organ shall explain the reasons to the infringed person. The time limit for handling a public security case that fails to reach an agreement through mediation or fails to perform after reaching an agreement shall be counted from the date when the mediation fails to reach an agreement or fails to perform after reaching an agreement.
Second, the reasons why the injury identification is not included in the time limit for handling cases
1. If the result of psychiatric appraisal or injury appraisal of the victim determines the nature of the case, such as having sex with the victim voluntarily, if the victim was mentally ill at that time, the suspect can be identified as suspected of rape. On the other hand, if the victim was not mentally ill at that time, he was not raped and no criminal facts occurred. If criminal compulsory measures are taken against the so-called suspects at this time, it is illegal and there is no problem.
2. If the nature of the case cannot be determined by the results of psychiatric appraisal or injury appraisal of the victim, it will not affect the handling of the case. If compulsory measures are taken against the criminal suspect, the time limit for psychiatric appraisal or injury appraisal of the victim shall be included in the time limit for handling the case.
From the above, it is not difficult to find that although there is a time limit for public security organs to handle cases, according to the regulations, the time limit for public security organs to conduct appraisal in order to find out the truth of cases is not included in the time limit for handling cases. Therefore, it is inaccurate to say that injury identification is included in the time limit for handling cases. With this knowledge, we should not doubt the efficiency of public security organs when we encounter public security cases and need to do injury identification. The above is the content compiled by Bian Xiao. There are online lawyers. If you have any questions, please feel free to consult.