Who is the criminal lawyer of the new archway?

Liu, a female student from China, sued CEO Liu XQ for new progress. On the 27th, the Minnesota court rejected JD. Request to cancel "Liu's joint responsibility for Liu's entry into the apartment". Mingzhou's criminal lawyer law says that this motion can really be said to be the woman's initial victory. However, because the case is still in the "procedural" stage, although JD.COM. Just because the motion of COM was rejected doesn't mean that this lady will start soon.

0 1

Liu filed a civil lawsuit in Mingzhou Court on April 20 19. Yi made six charges in the indictment, three of which were directed against Liu, including "Liu intentionally injured and beat in the car", "Liu illegally restricted his freedom in the car" and "Liu attacked the woman in the apartment". The other three charges accused the company of joint and several liability, including "joint and several liability for intentional injury and beating in the car" and "illegal restriction of freedom in the car".

02

According to the woman's complaint, the judge found that it was a continuous fact that Liu ate at a Japanese restaurant on the night of the incident and entered the apartment after getting on the bus. During this period, Liu's identity was "the founder of the company"; In addition, the woman pointed out that she had planned to tell Liu "I don't want to work in your company" in the apartment, and she also mentioned that Liu had told her "you can be the second" in the apartment, so it was speculated that the events in the apartment were related to work, so JD. The motion to dismiss the sixth charge was rejected.

Zhou Dong said that the whole case is still in the process of trial and has not yet entered a substantive trial. So, although the judge rejected JD. COM motion, it doesn't have much influence on who will win the final lawsuit.

He said that the case will enter the trial period next. At that time, both parties must participate in the credibility review of witnesses and physical evidence by experts. It will take some time, and with the current epidemic situation, it is estimated that the lawsuit will take another year, and I am afraid there will be results.

03

The whole incident is a game, and Liu was framed, which everyone knows; But what is the truth behind this matter? You certainly don't understand.

According to my analysis, the protagonist who didn't show up behind this incident is the culprit. Those who participated in the implementation of this event that night, including Liu, were only "Spades 3" and the protagonist was "King of Size". Their purpose is not only to discredit Liu and ask him for a sum of money, but to target the "April 2". ZTE, Huawei and so on. Scientific companies are well explained, including all scientific companies will become potential.

In fact, some international students were rebelled by XXX. After they returned home, they played Zhang Bangchang and Qin Gui respectively, secretly working for the "master", like Dr. XXX who worked in a magazine unrelated to his major after returning home, gaining everyone's trust in the name of counterfeiting, and then holding out genetically modified products. Many sand sculptures think that he is a real scientist, helping to make money in the name of "believing in science", just like in those days.

Liu and Liu Su are strangers. If no one guides and supports her, she, a female student, will never have the courage to frame Liu. Even if she had sex with Dong Ge, it was only for the money. This time, Dong Ge was lured into the game. She may be both "obeying orders" and "making a fortune conveniently". As can be seen from the video, she took the initiative, including holding Dong Qiang's hand and guiding him into her apartment. Afterwards, she pretended to be violated and falsely accused Dong Ge XQ of setting up a chastity memorial archway for herself.

I have to admit, Liu is really good-looking, not inferior to her sister with milk tea, but a good girl will pull a strange man into her boudoir in the middle of the night?