The remote trial video of Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court showed that Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court made a first-instance judgment on Zhejiang Sasuke Financial Information Service Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Sasuke Company) for alleged fund-raising fraud. Defendants Wang and Hu Wenzhou were both sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property; Shen Cong was found guilty, sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 12 years and fined100000 yuan. Chen E was found guilty, sentenced to 8 years in prison and fined 65,438+10,000 yuan.
Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court found through trial that on August 25th, 2065438+2005, Wang et al. established Zhejiang Sasuke Financial Information Service Co., Ltd., and on June 20th of the same year, established the "Niubanjin" P2P online loan financial platform online. According to the information of Niubanjin official website, the cumulative transaction scale of Niubanjin reached 39.088 billion yuan, and the cumulative user scale was 826,000 yuan.
Defendants Wang and Chen E, etc. Using the actually controlled company to issue loan targets with a term ranging from 1 day to 365 days on the "Niubanjin" platform, with the annualized interest rate of 7% ~ 15% of the investment income as bait, illegally raise funds from unspecified people in society through public publicity to protect the capital and interest.
2065438+July 2007, Wang et al. transferred Sasuke Company to the company under their control for 800 million yuan. Since August of the same year, Wang and others, knowing that there was a large amount of compensation on the Niubanjin platform that could not be paid, still cooperated with the controlled company to publish the loan target on the Niubanjin platform and illegally raise funds.
According to the audit, from 20 1 15 to 201July 3, 2007, "Niu Banjin" platform absorbed more than 78,000 people, totaling 391400,000 yuan. At the time of the incident, the actual loss of 42,800 people exceeded 3.87 billion yuan.
On the evening of July 3, 20 18, "Niubanjin" announced in official website that the loan project of 98,522,251yuan was overdue. On July 4 of the same year, founder and CEO Wang published an open letter saying that the project was overdue because of the harsh industry environment and a risk event led to a run. Subsequently, on July 6th, 2008, 2065438, Jianggan District Branch of Hangzhou Public Security Bureau issued a circular on the case of "Niubanjin" suspected of illegally absorbing public deposits.
After a lapse of one year, on 20 19 and 15, Jianggan District Branch of Hangzhou Public Security Bureau issued a case report again, and filed a case for investigation on the suspected fund-raising fraud of Zhejiang Sasuke Financial Information Service Co., Ltd. ("Niubanjin" platform) according to law. At the same time, the bank accounts of the companies and individuals involved in the case were frozen for 380 million yuan and multiple fund shares, 2 plots of land, 15 houses, 3 motor vehicles were seized, and the shares of two companies in Shanghai were frozen according to law.
Related question and answer: Niubanjin cannot be withdrawn. What is everyone's current situation? During the period of 201612.8-12.12, the charging and cashing functions of Niuban Gold will be closed, so please wait patiently to meet the needs of the online depository system of China Bank. Related Q&A: Is it true that Mr. Luo Xiang sent the opposing lawyer to court? Fake. This rumor doesn't even have legal knowledge.
Even if the opposing lawyer really has any problems, it is impossible to deal with them together.
For example, in a civil lawsuit, if the opposing lawyer infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of Luo Xiang, Luo Xiang should also file a separate lawsuit. It is impossible to "send in" the defendant in a civil lawsuit.
The defendant was sentenced, which means that this is a criminal case, because imprisonment is a punishment. But if it is a case of criminal private prosecution, in short, the crime is not big and it is impossible to sentence.
If this case happened to Luo Xiang, he could sue himself.
Private prosecution cases only include three categories:
1, telling to handle the case;
2. The victim has evidence to prove a minor criminal case;
3. Cases in which the victim has evidence to prove that the defendant has violated his personal and property rights and should be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law, but the public security organ or the people's procuratorate will not investigate the criminal responsibility of the defendant.
Whenever you hear that Luo Xiang has become a victim, a case of private prosecution can be simply understood as no big deal, and the ending is basically mediation. What else was sentenced?
When the defendant is sentenced, it means that the crime is very serious and can only be a public prosecution case.
The case of private prosecution is definitely not established. If there is a case, Luo Xiang can only be a third party. In this case, it can only be a public prosecution case, also known as a criminal prosecution case. It refers to cases in which procuratorial organs at all levels investigate the criminal responsibility of defendants on behalf of the state in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law.
In criminal prosecution cases, it is said that the defendant was "sent in" and sentenced. The prosecution must be the procuratorate, which has nothing to do with Luo Xiang.
In other words, this rumor has no common sense in litigation and is easy to be seen through.
Simply sort it out: if the case is related to Luo Xiang, he will definitely not be able to "send in" the other party; If the other party can be "sent in", the prosecutor must be the procuratorate rather than Luo Xiang. Can it be said that Luo Xiang sent the other party in?
It's that simple.