A judge once said that after reading the verdict, I feel that your son didn't do it, but this case can only be like this? . Earlier, a lawyer told Ma Yuping. Your son has admitted it himself. What can you say? . Lawyer Li Xun believes that there are many doubts in this case: this case was identified as a rape case, but no corpse materials such as semen were extracted from the victim; The confessions in Zhang Zhi's nine interrogation transcripts are inconsistent and unstable, for example, the victim's clothes have been changed many times; There is little physical evidence to prove Zhang Zhichao's crime in this case. The only physical evidence is a wooden stick that is thought to be inserted into the anus of the deceased, but the related substances of the victim and Zhang Zhichao's fingerprints have not been extracted from it; In addition, Li Xun believes that there are doubts about the time of the crime in Zhang Zhichao and the crime scene identified by the police.
Wang is one of the lawyers who provide appeal services. He said there were too many doubts in this case. First of all, the investigation experiment shows that it is impossible for Zhang Zhichao to complete a series of criminal acts within the time specified in the judgment. For example, according to the judgment of Linyi Intermediate People's Court in that year, in about three and a half minutes, Zhang Zhichao needed to finish the rape, murder, hiding the body, telling his accomplices not to report the case, and at the same time, he had to run downstairs, pass through the students who were running and exercising, and go to the canteen to buy a lock and lock the door. We have done this experiment, just running down to buy a lock, even if there is no one on it without going through the students (doing morning exercises), this time will not be over. ?
In addition, the verdict found that the place where Zhang Zhichao committed rape was in a corridor with people moving at any time. Wang thinks this is against common sense. The owner of the canteen downstairs also testified. His canteen didn't open until after 7 o'clock in the morning, and the time he bought the lock in the judgment was after 6: 20, so the owner has proved that he never opened the card after 6: 20, and it is impossible for the owner to sell the lock. ?
In Wang's view, there is another very important doubt, that is, the clothes worn by the deceased before being killed in the witness testimony are completely different from those worn at the crime scene. According to a girl who entered the campus with the deceased when she entered the school that morning and lived with her the night before (at the time of the crime), a transcript made to the police that day mentioned that the clothes worn by the deceased were yellow cotton-padded clothes and white pants, while at the scene of death, she (the deceased) wore red cotton-padded clothes and blue pants. So obviously, it is impossible for the deceased to change clothes after entering the school for more than ten minutes, so this is also a very important doubt. ? Previous 1 /3 Next page