Analysis of Lawyers' Answers in The Easy Chair of the Master of Crime
first step
Question: Who is the most suspected of stealing toys? Please enter your answer; For example: Xiaomei; This problem does not increase the integral)
Answer: Xiaohua
Analysis:
This is a topic to introduce polygraph behavior. Starting with the stolen things, the mecha car has little attraction to the little girls. It is said that Xiaomei cried, which is the embodiment of timid character, and the probability of stealing is extremely small; Xiaomei, too, has her own doll; For Xiao Li, it can be judged that he is precocious in speech and behavior, interested in the game of switch game console, and the price of switch game console is relatively expensive, so the probability of stealing things with game console is relatively small; Xiaohua is the most suspicious. In behavior, real anger begins slowly, gradually forms and then erupts. Suddenly knocking on the table is too radical. People who are really angry are consistent in their words and deeds, that is, they can't control their emotions when they speak, so they are too radical. Obviously Xiaohua is pretending to be angry. He is probably a thief.
The second obstacle
Question: What is unreasonable about women? Please enter your answer; Listed as follows: 2; This problem does not increase the integral)
Answer: 5
Analysis:
* * * There are five unreasonable points. 1: There are my own photos in the new book. Why does a loyal fan need to confirm my authorship? Unreasonable point 2: The lady claimed that she came by bike, and it was raining at the beginning of her signature. She didn't have an umbrella, why didn't she show signs of getting wet, and she was neat and smelled of perfume; Unreasonable point 3: The new book is called "The Art of Profiling and Lie Detection", but the lady calls it "The Art of Lie Detection and Profiling". A loyal fan will not say the title of his favorite author's new book wrong; Unreasonable point 4: the lady comes by bike. In order to hurry, she shouldn't wear delicate makeup, and her clothes will be a little messy because of riding a bike, so she shouldn't dress neatly. Unreasonable point five: there is something in the words. When describing the experience of a day, the order of washing, eating and making up is wrong. These three things will take some time to complete, and the real experience will form a deeper sequential memory. If you tell a lie, you can't describe it correctly. Pupillary dilation is a sign of nervousness, such as panic, anger, fear or seeing something you like. Obviously, this is panic. Touching your hand is a kind of body language to comfort yourself, and patting your forehead means regret. All kinds of body language and verbal contradictions reflect that the lady lied.
third stage
Question: What is the password for extracting attachments? (Please enter the decompression password, for example: plum blossom)
Answer: Xiaogou
Analysis:
There is no plum blossom painter in the textbook of the first grade of primary school. There is a verse poem for children in the first grade textbook 12, called "Little Painter in Snow". The original text is:
It's snowing. It's snowing. A group of little painters came in the snow. Chickens draw bamboo leaves, dogs draw plum blossoms, ducklings draw maple leaves and ponies draw crescent moons. No paint, no pen, a few steps and a picture. Why didn't the frog take part? He fell asleep in the cave.
So the plum painter corresponds to the puppy, and the pinyin of the puppy is the decompression password: puppy.
Fourth layer
Q: Where are the contradictions? Please enter your answer, for example: Dormitory will not get extra points.
Answer: Windows.
Analysis:
In the indictment, Wang Ming mentioned that when he came back from the window after picking vegetables, he caught a glimpse of Zhang Xiao poisoning the pot in the kitchen. According to the normal situation, the vegetable field is only near the living room window. If Wang Ming is in a hurry to cook noodles and go home after picking vegetables, in theory, he only passes through Zhang Xiao's living room window (green route), but the living room window is blocked by the kitchen wall and can't see Zhang Xiao's kitchen. Obviously, there is a contradiction.
Fifth floor
Q: What is the contradiction between the confessions of Wang Ming and Zhang Xiao? (Please enter the answers in descending order, for example: 123)
Answer: 278
Analysis:
In Zhang Xiao's confession, Zhang Xiao said that he walked to his home at 19:20, then slept in the bedroom and got up at 20:00 to go to the toilet, so Zhang Xiao was in the bedroom from 19:20 to 20:00. Wang Ming can't have seen Zhang Xiao poisoned in the kitchen. In Wang Ming's testimony, answers 2, 7 and 8 all claimed to see Zhang Xiao in the kitchen, which was contradictory.
Sixth layer
Q: Is Zhang Xiao guilty? If guilty, please establish a clue serial number to make the defendant logically guilty; If not guilty, please establish a clue serial number to exonerate the defendant who is logically close. Please enter your answers in alphabetical order (for example, abcdef)
Answer: cefijk
Analysis:
Although Zhang Xiao lied and didn't pay alimony to Liu Lishui's parents, other confessions were basically true, and there was no key clue to overturn Zhang Xiao's confession. However, there are many doubts between Wang Ming's confession and Zhang Xiao's confession, so judging the authenticity of Wang Ming's confession is the key to this case. As soon as the old and new clues are integrated, a complete clue chain will introduce new results:
The first is clue E, the contradiction of Wang Ming in the prosecution opinion. According to the normal situation, the kitchen can't be seen, and this clue attracts attention.
Followed by clue one, the contradiction in the transcript of the first question. Here, the timelines of Wang Ming and Zhang Xiao are wrong, so some people's confessions are wrong, and they should be pointed out immediately after the contradictions in Wang Ming's indictment.
After that, there should be a clue K. There is a small detail that tells Wang Ming that he is nearsighted, that is, Zhang Xiao called Wang Ming "lying with glasses", which can be refined.
Then there was clue C. Wang Ming broke his glasses on September 8 and got a new pair of glasses on September 1 1. This shows that Wang _ didn't wear glasses on the day of September 10. Because of his blurred vision, he probably misjudged the person.
Then there is the access clue J, Wang Ming's second interrogation record. In the transcript, although Wang Ming explained clearly why he went to Zhang Xiao's kitchen window, he obviously showed hesitation and no longer believed that he saw Zhang Xiao at that time.
The final key evidence is F, the result of field investigation. Paraquat was detected in the pot at the scene, and there were paraquat residues in the fried vegetables, which indicated that someone had fried vegetables in Zhang Xiaojia's kitchen pot and poisoned them. Paraquat remains on the kitchen floor, and the kitchen rag is also stained with paraquat, indicating that people who cook in the kitchen use paraquat to poison and wipe the paraquat that accidentally falls on the floor, which can rule out the possibility of poisoning by outsiders. Whoever cooks in the kitchen is the poisoner. According to Wang Ming's testimony, he did see someone cooking in the kitchen around 19:35. If it's not Zhang Xiao, then only Liuli Water will cook in the kitchen!
This clue has nothing to do with this case. A can't prove that Zhang Xiao killed Liu Lishui, and there is no corresponding key clue. B belongs to the concept of facts and corresponds to a time axis. D is irrelevant to this case. I is the summary clue of GH, and the simultaneous GH can get the I clue, that is, the timeline of Wang Ming and Zhang Xiao does not match. When G and H are used as clues alone, new clues cannot be refined.