199665438+On February 22nd, Yu Yingsheng was arrested on suspicion of intentional homicide. Subsequently, Bengbu Intermediate People's Court sentenced Yu Yingsheng to life imprisonment for intentional homicide and deprived him of political rights for life. The second instance ruling of Anhui Provincial High Court upheld the original judgment. His father and brother have been complaining about 10 for years.
2065438+On May 3, 20031day, Anhui Provincial High Court decided to file a case for review according to the first paragraph of Article 243rd of the Criminal Law.
20 13 On June 27th, Anhui Provincial High Court decided to form a collegial panel for retrial.
On August 20 1313, the Anhui Higher People's Court publicly pronounced that Yu Yingsheng's case of intentional wife killing was unclear and the evidence was insufficient, and Yu Yingsheng was not guilty. Subsequently, Bengbu Public Security Bureau initiated the re-investigation procedure.
2013165438+1On October 27th, Wu Qinyuan was under control in Bengbu and confessed to the crime of raping and killing Han 17 years ago.
20 15 1.5, Wuhu Intermediate People's Court held a closed trial of the suspect Wu Qinyuan according to the jurisdiction designated by the Anhui Provincial High Court. Yu Yingsheng filed civil compensation against Wu Qinyuan, including death compensation, alimony and alimony.
201May 15, Wuhu Intermediate People's Court of Anhui Province publicly pronounced Wu Qinyuan's rape case in the first instance, sentenced Wu Qinyuan to death for rape and deprived him of political rights for life. Wu Qinyuan is suspected to be the murderer of Yu Yingsheng's wife murder case in Bengbu. He used to be a policeman of the traffic police detachment of Bengbu Public Security Bureau.
On the morning of 20 16 65438+ 10/KLOC-5, the Higher People's Court of Anhui Province held a public hearing to pronounce a verdict on the rape appeal of Wu Qinyuan, the real murderer of Yu Yingsheng's wife murder case in Bengbu, Anhui Province, and ruled that the appeal was dismissed and the death penalty was upheld, and it was reported to the Supreme People's Court for approval according to law. On February 2, Bengbu citizen Lu Han was killed at home. According to reports, according to the scene situation and autopsy report at that time, the nature of the case can be determined as a homicide case of suffocation, and the time of committing the crime is around 7 am. There is no sign of forcible destruction of doors and windows in Yingsheng's two-bedroom and one-bedroom home. The room was not messy, and there were no obvious signs of fighting. According to the preliminary investigation results of the public security organs, it is considered that the evidence has formed the conditions for bringing legal proceedings.
Before the incident, 34-year-old Yu Yingsheng (see entry: Yu Yingsheng) served as the assistant to the head of the former East District (now Longzihu District) of Bengbu City, and was a cross-century cadre specially trained by the Organization Department of the Municipal Party Committee. On August 5, 20 13, Yu Yingsheng's wife-killing case was heard in Fuyang in private. According to the new evidence provided by the procuratorate and the defense lawyer, it is considered that the evidence of Yu Yingsheng's intentional homicide in the original trial is not true and sufficient, and the contradiction between the evidence in this case has not been eliminated through joint efforts, which is not exclusive and unique. Accordingly, the original judgment of the first instance and the ruling of the second instance were revoked according to law, and Yu Yingsheng was declared innocent.
On August 3, 20 13, 13, the Anhui Provincial High Court publicly pronounced that the fact that Yu Yingsheng intentionally killed his wife was unclear, and the evidence of the crime was not unique and exclusive, and Yu Yingsheng was acquitted. After being released in court, the relevant departments of Bengbu City resumed their official positions and were a chief clerk of the civil affairs system of Bengbu City.
Yu Yingsheng's Zhao Xue case is the first case in which Anhui Province changed its sentence after reiterating that the suspected crime was unprincipled. 20 13 On February 3rd, 13, Bengbu Public Security Bureau released a long microblog in Weibo, saying that the police in this city had cracked a rape and murder case that happened in this city 17 years ago by using high-tech means. According to Weibo, after Yu Yingsheng was acquitted, Bengbu Public Security Bureau immediately started the re-investigation procedure, and transferred more than 40 elite troops to form a task force. Anhui Public Security Bureau also sent criminal investigation experts to fully guide the investigation of the case. In the process of detecting the case, the task force combed the original case file and material evidence comprehensively and carefully, and obtained the key evidence of the suspect's DNA at the crime scene.
Due to the long time of the incident, it is difficult to find out the arrangement. The task force successfully detected the unique information in the suspect's DNA sample through careful analysis, bold imagination, repeated comparison and analysis with many criminal scientific research units across the country and high-tech means. After careful investigation by the police in Jiangsu, Anhui and other places, the police locked the suspect Wu Qinyuan (see entry: Wu Qinyuan).
2013165438+127 October, the criminal suspect Wu Qinyuan was under the control of the police in Bengbu, and confessed to the criminal facts before 17. Bengbu Public Security Bureau has apologized to Yu Yingsheng and his family for the wrong case of Yu Yingsheng. At the same time, in accordance with the "Provisions on the Accountability of Law Enforcement Faults of the People's Police of Public Security Organs" and the relevant provisions of the Anhui Provincial Public Security Department, the investigation procedure for this misjudged case has been initiated. The police also said that in a responsible attitude towards law and history, they will conduct a serious and comprehensive investigation in strict accordance with legal procedures and those responsible will be dealt with according to law and discipline. 201May 14, the rape case of Wu Qinyuan, a suspect in Yu Yingsheng's wife murder case in Bengbu, Anhui Province, was publicly pronounced in the first instance. Defendant Wu Qinyuan was sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life by the Intermediate People's Court of Wuhu City, Anhui Province for committing rape.
Wuhu Intermediate People's Court held that the defendant Wu Qinyuan violated the will of women, forcibly had sexual relations with the victim Han by violent means, and caused the victim to die during the rape, which constituted the crime of rape. After Wu Qinyuan discovered Han's death, in order to cover up the crime, he cut Han's neck with a kitchen knife and tried to completely destroy the scene by detonating a liquefied gas tank. The consequences of crime are extremely serious, the criminal means are extremely cruel, and the crime is extremely serious, which should be severely punished according to law. Wuhu Intermediate People's Court found that the defendant Wu Qinyuan's behavior constituted rape, sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life.
The judgment also requires the defendant Wu Qinyuan to compensate the plaintiff Yu Yingsheng and others for economic losses of 52,300 yuan within 10 days after the judgment takes effect. Guo Zhilong, lawyer of Anhui Huidu Law Firm: The responsibility system for handling cases will further avoid the occurrence of unjust, false and wrong cases and promote judicial independence.
Wang Wei, a professor at Anhui Normal University Law School, said: Undoubtedly, the concept of presumption of innocence will play an important role in the trial of cases that can stand the test of history. CCTV: Anhui Yu Yingsheng case, justice was late 19 years. Obviously, such an unjust case cannot be made up by acquittal, state compensation or apology. An unfair case damages not only the interests of the parties, but also people's expectation of fairness and justice. Correcting unjust, false and misjudged cases must emphasize facts and evidence; Correcting unjust, false and misjudged cases must restore the truth; To correct unjust, false and misjudged cases, the case handlers must be investigated; To correct the unjust case, we must draw inferences from others to prevent it from happening again. Injustice is not only personal, but also a scar in the process of national legalization. Such scars always remind us that without fairness and justice, we cannot become a civilized and prosperous country.