The only way to get a patent is to apply for a patent, and so is the invention patent. After successful application and authorization, you can enjoy the relevant rights of invention patent. Of course, even if you apply for an invention patent, you can't avoid disputes, just saying that it will be beneficial to you. Case Analysis-How to Solve the Dispute of Invention Patent: On October 4th, 20 16/kloc-0, a Shenzhen Medicine Bag Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Shenzhen Company") sued the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court, claiming that it applied to China National Intellectual Property Administration for an invention patent on September 9th, 20 14. In the production and sales activities, it is found that a technology company in Wuxi (hereinafter referred to as "Wuxi Technology Company") produces, declares and exports the same products as the invention patents of Shenzhen Company, and sells them at low prices, and at the same time promotes its infringing products to China. The invention patent right includes all technical solutions from claim 1 to claim 17. According to the principle of universal insurance and the claim of Shenzhen Company, the products of Wuxi Science and Technology Company belong to the protection scope of its claims. In addition, Shenzhen Company found that, in addition to Wuxi Technology Company, a plastic company in Wuxi (hereinafter referred to as "Wuxi Plastic Company") and a plastic company in Jiangyin (hereinafter referred to as "Jiangyin Plastic Company") had infringement with Wuxi Technology Company, and they were all affiliated companies. Therefore, Shenzhen Company requested the court to decide the defendant Wuxi Technology Company and its affiliated companies according to law: 1. Immediately stop the production and sale of products that infringe the patent rights involved, publicly apologize, immediately destroy the infringing products produced in stock and online, and immediately destroy the molds and related equipment used to produce infringing products; 2, joint compensation for the plaintiff 3 million yuan; 3. In order to stop the infringement, jointly pay the plaintiff's attorney fee of 6,543,800 yuan+0,320 yuan, and related travel expenses, investigation fees and other rights protection expenses; 4. bear the litigation costs of this case. Case analysis: The scope of protection of the patent right for invention or utility model is subject to the content of the claim, which can be explained by the description and attached drawings. Claims shall have independent claims or dependent claims. The independent claim shall reflect the technical scheme of the invention or utility model as a whole and record the necessary technical features to solve the technical problems. The dependent claims shall further define the cited claims with additional technical features. That is, the claim should have an independent claim, which reflects the technical scheme of the invention or utility model as a whole and records the necessary technical characteristics to solve technical problems. It should be considered that the technical features written by the patentee in the independent claim are all necessary technical features and should not be ignored, and the positional relationship between components in the structure should also be specific technical features, which should all be included in the comparison of technical features. For this case, the focus of the dispute is: 1, whether the alleged infringing product belongs to the scope of patent protection involved; 2. Do Wuxi Science and Technology Company, Wuxi Plastic Company and Jiangyin Plastic Company jointly produce, sell or promise to sell the alleged infringing products? Regarding the first controversy, firstly, Wuxi Science and Technology Company, Wuxi Plastic Company and Jiangyin Plastic Company claim that the alleged infringing products lack the feature that the protruding part is above the first limiting flange, because the patent claim 1 involved states that the protruding part is above the first limiting flange, and the rib of the alleged infringing products is located at the notch of the first limiting flange and perpendicular to the first limiting flange, and the position of the first protruding rib relative to the first limiting flange is still in the upper area. The patent claim 1 also clearly states the position of the "protrusion", but does not specifically describe its characteristics. According to the principle of patent claim interpretation, the "prominent part" feature in the patent claim should be explained by reading the relevant contents in the specification, and on this basis, the protection scope of the patent involved should be accurately and reasonably determined. Legal basis: Article 26 of the Patent Law: To apply for a patent for invention or utility model, a request, specification, abstract, patent right and other documents shall be submitted. The request shall specify the name of the invention or utility model, the name of the inventor, the name and address of the applicant and other matters. The specification shall give a clear and complete description of the invention or utility model, which shall be subject to the realization of the technical personnel in the technical field; Attached drawings shall be attached when necessary. The technical points of the invention or utility model shall be briefly explained. The patent claim shall be based on the specification, and clearly and briefly define the scope of patent protection. For inventions that rely on genetic resources, the applicant shall state the direct source and original source of genetic resources in the patent application documents; If the applicant cannot explain the original source, it shall explain the reasons. Article 7 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Disputes: If the technical scheme accused of infringement adds other technical features on the basis of closing all the technical features of the claim, the people's court shall determine that the technical scheme accused of infringement does not belong to the protection scope of the patent right, except that the added technical features belong to the inevitable conventional impurities. The closed composition claim mentioned in the preceding paragraph generally does not include the Chinese medicine composition claim. Article 2 If the claim claimed by the obligee in a patent infringement lawsuit is declared invalid by the Patent Reexamination Board, the people's court hearing the patent infringement dispute case may rule that the obligee's lawsuit based on the invalid claim shall be rejected. If there is evidence to prove that the decision to declare the above-mentioned creditor's rights invalid has been revoked by the effective administrative judgment, the obligee may file another lawsuit. If the patentee files a lawsuit again, the limitation period of action shall be counted from the date when the administrative judgment mentioned in the second paragraph of this article is served.