0 1. The case of a man killing his wife and son in Guizhou was retried after a lapse of 19 years. On September 24th, 2020, the case of a man who killed his wife and son in Guizhou was heard again after a lapse of 19. This case was first pronounced at 0 1. Because there are doubts in the case, coupled with the constant complaints of the suspect and his family, the trial was held again.
According to the prosecution, it happened in the early morning of March 20th, 200 1 year. Because of Li's derailment, (a pseudonym) had a conflict with his wife. After returning home, Li Xian strangled his wife and suffocated his son with a pillow for fear that his son would make a noise.
At 9 o'clock on the evening of the 20 th, Li found his mistress Meng (a pseudonym), and the two dismembered the body. After that, Meng used a basket to send the body to the steelmaking furnace for burning. Explain that Li and Meng both work in steel mills.
On 01September 10, the case was heard for the first time, and Li Zaitang denied that he had killed himself, saying that he was forced to confess. The court finally sentenced Li to death, and Meng was sentenced to 8 years as an accessory.
02. Doubts abound. At that time, the case was indeed full of doubts. First, there is no physical evidence to prove that Li is the murderer. The only evidence is the confession of Li and Meng, but this is exactly one of the doubts.
The second point is that the confessions of Li and Meng are different. According to Li's lawyer, there are many differences and contradictions in their confessions. Since there is a contradiction, it is that one party is lying.
Third, Li has no motive to kill. Although Li cheated, according to Li's family and friends, Li's wife forgave Li, and Li and Meng broke off contact long before the incident.
Fourth, according to the blood of Li's wife at the scene, Li's wife had active bleeding caused by an open wound before her death, that is, massive bleeding death, which contradicted Li's statement that she strangled her.
Fifth, the two kitchen knives that were identified as dismembered at that time had no traces of wear and no curling edges. Some people speculate that the dismembered body will definitely have wear and tear. So this case is very likely to be an unjust case.