What happened to Michael Jackson?

None of you are real fans, right?

Now, listen carefully:

I just read a report about him last Sunday (from CCTV-10). His skin turned white for a reason, but he had vitiligo (a skin disease) that was difficult to treat and affected his appearance. Large patches of abnormal white skin began to appear on his body, which was so different from his dark skin that it looked ugly.

Quoting Michael Jackson:

I'm tired of being manipulated. This oppression is real! They are liars and the history books are full of lies. You must know that all popular music, from jazz to rock to hip-hop, to dance music, is created by black people! But this has been pushed into the corner of the history books! You never see a black person on the cover. You only see Elvis and the Rolling Stones, but who were the real pioneers?

Since I've broken records - I've broken Elvis' records, I've broken Beatles' records - then what? They called me a freak, a fag, a child molester! They said I bleached my skin and did everything they could to discredit me. These are all conspiracies! When I stood in front of the mirror and looked at myself, I knew that I was black!

This is blatant racial discrimination! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Post the most misunderstood great artist - Michael Jackson.

Michael Jackson

Michael Jackson, the dazzling name in the pop music world and the most famous superstar, has been shrouded in overwhelming negative media reports for more than ten years, and has been submerged in the world's after-dinner thoughts. In wanton ridicule.

Where is the real Michael Jackson? However, he is a very caring person. He has been calling for peace, advocating environmental protection, conveying fraternity, paying attention to society, and criticizing injustice in his songs. In reality, he did the same - in his more than 20 years of charity career, he has made the greatest contribution to charity among all artists in the world. He has won many humanitarian awards and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twice. In addition to donating to nearly 40 charities around the world, he also founded the Save the World Foundation (established in 1992) and the Save the Children Foundation Heal (20065438). Michael Jackson Burn Center (founded in 1984.2), Michael Jackson AIDS Relief Center (founded in 1986), Michael Jackson Colored Education Foundation (founded in 1987), Michael Jackson Children's Hospital (founded in Warsaw - 1993), "Michael Jackson Children's Hospital" (Founded in Paris - 1995)" and "Michael Jackson Diabetes Foundation (Founded in Paris - 1999), VS Michael, who has always kept silent, must have other research institutions and welfare funds. However, the media is unwilling to publicize all this because they do not There is a need for pop singers with a savior image. In order to satisfy the public's curiosity, they would rather report or even create some negative, dark, and sensational news.

For many years, Michael Jackson has been demonized by the media. The most obvious one is: knowing clearly that he has severe vitiligo, he insists that he is bleached, which misleads many people and caused Michael to suffer injustice for more than ten years.

Knowing that there are too many doubts about his "child molestation case", and even before the truth comes out, I can't wait to convict him!

The following articles and pictures will analyze Michael's skin color and his two "child molestation cases" layer by layer

The skin changes of this black woman are strikingly similar to Michael Jackson's . The girl in the photo is her daughter.

Picture preview: (Click on preview to browse the original picture.)

Analysis of two cases of child molestation.

A brief explanation: What is pedophilia? Experts point out that if a real pedophile is not caught, he will violate at least 240 children in his life, because this is pathological and he will never be able to control it!

What about Michael Jackson? Friends around him say he is just a big boy with a mental age of 12. So he likes to play with boys. His manor is a super amusement park that has been open to children from all over the world, especially sick and poor children, free of charge for more than a decade. These children came to Michael's estate, Neverland (the magical island described in the fairy tale "Peter Pan") through various charities, where the children would never grow up. ) Millions of kids have come to Michael over the years, but in the past two decades, only two boys have come forward to say that Michael sexually abused him at the instigation of adults. If Michael is indeed a pedophile, what about the other children? Don't let him sell it all?

First analyze the time in 1993. If the boy was really molested, why didn't his father call the police? Instead, go to a civil lawyer to discuss how to obtain financial compensation. The police later intervened and searched all of Michael's residences and took away all of his personal belongings, including videos, tapes, pictures, CDs and books, but found no "evidence of a crime." When the police questioned the boy, the boy initially vehemently denied that Michael had done anything unreasonable to him, but the boy's father later provided the police with the boy's confession to Michael. It has now been established that the boy's father, a dentist, took him to have his teeth extracted and he was injected with sodium amital (a hypnotic drug that has nothing to do with dental surgery and can force something into your head out of thin air!) The boy's father had no explanation for this, except that he happened to take his son to have a tooth extracted that day, and the son confessed. If the boy was really so badly hurt, why would a father continue to take his son for newspaper interviews, asking him to repeat the so-called "painful" experience of being sexually abused over and over again? If this is true, doesn’t it make boys hurt again and again? Importantly, the boy's stepfather recorded a phone call between him and the boy's father: If I don't get everything I want, I'm going to have a massacre! In the end, he got a lot of money, and before suing Michael Jackson, he sued his ex-wife and got custody of his son. This was very important to him, because only by having custody of his son could he control the compensation. .

Doesn’t the above-mentioned behavior of the boy’s father prove that this is a false accusation against Michael Jackson by a greedy father at the expense of using his own son as a tool?

Secret recordings of the boy’s father were exposed in the 1993 incident

In fact, these recordings were exposed as early as 1994, but the media at that time was more keen to convict Michael Jackson and deliberately Ignored and didn't get the publicity it deserved. But the detailed article was published in the famous American leisure publication "GQ" magazine. After this case occurred, Columbia Media Company in the United States re-exposed part of the recording when reporting on the case:

Original pictures from the TV movie:

The boy’s father:

"This man will be humiliated beyond belief... He will not believe what is happening to him, it is beyond the bounds of his worst nightmare. ... He will never sell another record . . . . If I make it through, I will be victorious. . . . I will get everything I want... and they will be destroyed forever."

Related links. - From GQ Magazine

…

Chandler (the boy’s father) became increasingly violent and threatening, which brought him into conflict with Jackson, Dave Schwart Schwartz (the boy's stepfather) and Joan Chandler Schwartz were estranged.

In early July 1993, Dave Schwartz (the boy's stepfather), who had been friends with Chandler, secretly recorded a lengthy phone conversation between them. During the conversation, Chandler expressed his concern for his son and his anger toward Jackson and his ex-wife, whom he described as "cold-blooded." In the recording, Chandler said that when he tried to remind his ex-wife of his suspicions about Jackson, she told him to "fuck you."

"Michael and I have great communication," Chandler told Schwartz. "We were friends. I liked him and respected him and everything about him. There was no reason for him to suddenly not call me. One day I was sitting in my room talking to Michael and telling him what I wanted from the relationship. Tell him what I want!"

He admitted to Schwartz that he had rehearsed what to say and what not to say, and Chandler never mentioned money in their conversation. When Schwartz asked what Jackson had done to make Chandler so upset, Chandler claimed only that "He divided families. My kids were seduced by that rich, powerful guy." Both men repeatedly berated themselves for not having Be a good father to this child.

Elsewhere in the tape, Chandler noted that he was ready to start fighting Jackson: "I'm ready," Chandler told Schwartz. "There were other relevant people waiting for my call, ready to go. I had already paid them. Everything was going according to plan, and of course I didn't make the plan alone. Once I made that call, the guy (His lawyer Barry K. Rothman) can destroy anyone in his sight, even in the most devious, dirty, cruel way and I will let him do it."

Chandler also predicted that in six weeks, everything will begin: "If I get past this, I'm going to win big. I'm never going to lose. I'm going to turn it upside down. I'm going to get what I want Everything they want, they will be destroyed forever. Joan will lose custody of the child, and Michael's career will be terminated." "Is it good for the child?" Schwartz asked.

"That's none of my business," Chandler replied. "This will be bigger than all of us put together. Everything will collapse and everyone inside will be destroyed. If I don't get everything I want, I'll have a bloodbath!"

Instead of going to the police to file a report - the most appropriate way to handle a child molestation case - Chandler went to a lawyer. Not just lawyers. He found Barry Rothman.

"The lawyer I'm looking for is the dirtiest one," Chandler told Schwartz on the phone. "What he wants to do is to make it public as soon as possible, make it as big as possible, and embarrass the most people. His methods are dirty and cruel, but he is excellent. He has always wanted to be famous in the world."

" 03 Child Abduction Case" Analysis

In 2003, British journalist Martin Barschel defrauded Michael Jackson's trust. After following Jackson for eight months, he filmed the documentary "With Michael... Jackson" and was broadcast around the world. The current child molestation case is largely based on Basheer's 100 Minutes documentary, because the accuser boy - cancer boy Jiyun and his brother and sister once appeared in the documentary, and the boy said in the film that Jackson helped him overcome the disease , and became friends with him. He shook hands with Jackson, talked and laughed, and admitted that he and his brother had spent the night in Jackson's room. Jackson said children like to spend the night in his room, and they can come as long as their parents give permission. The boy said his mother was delighted when she heard he was spending the night in Jackson's room. As they talked and laughed, the boy rested his head on Jackson's shoulder. Although Martin Bascher admitted in the documentary that he did not see anything unusual between Jackson and the boys, on the contrary, he also saw that the children were very fond of Jackson. But he still used it as a close-up in the film, implying that Jackson had an abnormal relationship with the boy Ji Yun. Sure enough, in February 2003, this documentary caused huge controversy after it was broadcast around the world. So the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services visited the boy's family to ask if Jackson had done anything to the boy.

The boy's family strongly denied that Jackson treated the boy Ji Yun like his biological father and had never done anything to harm Ji Yun. However, a few months later, in June 2003, the boy's family reported to the police that Jackson had "sexually assaulted" the boy. Strangely, the police remained silent after receiving the report. Finally, five months later, in June 2003 and October 165,438, Jackson's estate was searched and a "wanted order" was issued.

There is an important doubt here, which is the "time of the crime" mentioned by the plaintiff. The documentary that sparked the accusations was broadcast on February 6, 2003. The Department of Children and Family Services investigated the boy's family from February 14, 2003 to February 27, 2003. The earliest the "sexual assault" claimed by the plaintiff's family occurred was February 11, 2002, and later changed to 2003. February 7th, year. No matter how confusing the prosecution's timing is, we just have one question: During the two years that Jackson communicated with the boy's family, the boy's family visited Jackson's home multiple times, and the boy said he and his brother spent several hours in Jackson's bedroom. night, but no "sexual harassment" occurred during the past two years. Jackson, on the other hand, suggested he was a pedophile. After the documentary aired, people all over the world focused their attention on him, focusing on the suspicion that he had an abnormal relationship with the boy Ji Yun. Under the investigation of the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services, he was found dead in less than a month. Within months, he blatantly "sexually assaulted" the boy Ji Yun many times! This story is so false!

However, the police really prosecuted this suspicious case! Let’s take a look at the “committing process” and “motive” mentioned by the prosecutor in his opening statement! Prosecutor Tom Snyden believes that the documentary "Living with Michael Jackson" has had a huge negative impact on Jackson after it was broadcast around the world, while the accuser and his family are considered "potentially dangerous". So Jackson and five assistants (all immune from prosecution) kidnapped the accuser's family and forced them to make a video praising Jackson. On the night the video was made, Jackson began his first "sexual assault" on the accuser boy. Jackson's "motive" stemmed from his "economic crisis" because Jackson was already "heavily in debt." Not wanting the accuser's family to cause him any more trouble, he kidnapped the family and plotted to transport them to a remote location in Brazil, where Jackson eventually sexually assaulted the boy multiple times.

How do you feel after reading the above text? I just feel dumbfounded. However, such a shabby opening statement in the United States was reported as "powerful" by the media in China, which really makes people speechless. In fact, after the prosecution's opening statement, many people in the legal profession believed that this charge was very unreasonable and too weak. Jackson would definitely win this charge! The prosecution was doomed from the start!

So why is such a weak case still being prosecuted? One person must be mentioned here. This person is Jackson's mortal enemy, Tom Snyder, nicknamed "Mad Dog", the Santa Barbara City Prosecutor responsible for the "93 Child Abuse Case" and the case. I wonder if you have ever heard Michael’s D.S. song from the 1995 historical album? This song is about Tom Sneddon. Because in 1993, after the plaintiff's civil complaint against Jackson alerted the police, prosecutor Tom Snyden forced Jackson to undergo a humiliating naked examination on the grounds of examining evidence. Not only did he videotape and take photos, but he also sent a forensic doctor to examine his body. every part of. If Jackson doesn't cooperate, he will be considered guilty. (The medical examiner determined that Jackson suffered from vitiligo, but this did not change the media's slander of his "bleached skin.") In the end, the "93 child molestation case" ended in an out-of-court settlement. The accuser refused to testify against Jackson, much to Snyder's dismay. To this end, he specifically proposed to amend a local law provision, that is, "child sex cases" cannot be settled out of court and can only be tried as criminal cases.

Jackson was greatly insulted at that time, so he wrote that D.S. He sang it very well! I’ve been inseparable from Snyder ever since.

You can imagine how ecstatic the boy's family was when they found Snyder in June 2003! Ten years later, he finally got another chance! However, he stood still until five months later, from June 165438 to October 19, 2003, when he ordered a large-scale search of Jackson's estate and issued a wanted warrant! And this day happens to be the release day of Jackson's new championship collection!

On the second day of the search for Michael's estate, Tom Snyder convened a grand press conference. At the meeting, he couldn't help laughing. He even had the paparazzi call Jackson "Weird Jack"! His behavior caused dissatisfaction among the masses, and he later had to publicly apologize, saying that if his mother was still alive, she would definitely blame him. (Just kidding with Jackson, these words come from Jackson's D.S.: Tom Snyder is a cold man, he just wants to catch me, dead or alive... I don't think his mother raised him well ...)

Two days later, Jackson responded to the warrant, surrendered, and was sent to jail in handcuffs. He is, of course, entitled to bail. But how much bail did Tom Snyder set for Jackson? Three million dollars! ! This is the highest bail amount in U.S. history! You know, in the United States, the bail for a defendant in a "child sexual assault case" is about $70,000, and even the bail for a serial killer suspect is only one million! In the Jackson case, the prosecution clearly violated the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which stipulates that the defendant shall not be granted "excess bail"!

As the case unfolded, suspicions grew: What would have been brought to the table without the overzealous prosecutor Tom Snyden? ! This is not a personal grudge, what is it? ! This is not judicial corruption, what is it? !

When such a ridiculous case is brought to court, and when the great artist and philanthropist Michael Jackson is pushed into the dock, what I see is human kindness, innocence, freedom and the justice of the law. Being pushed into the dock with dignity! The case trial process is like a super circus show! The one-sided negative coverage of Jackson by the American media is an insult to the fair and democratic face of the United States! As a Chinese in the United States said: If you watch TV programs carefully, you will feel the creepy racial discrimination on the faces and mouths of white TV anchors. It is an evil that you cannot prosecute, no law can change, and often you cannot explain it.

In the end, Jackson was proven innocent! A jury of 12 people unanimously found Michael Jackson not guilty of ten counts!

Jackson is innocent! Justice is back! Fans went wild, but Jackson remained surprisingly calm. Perhaps, exhausted both physically and mentally, he had long understood that even if the law was fair and he was innocent, the media and the world had already convicted him. But how could he change this?

If you don’t know him and the whole case, then please don’t comment on this person and this matter! If you think he bought off the innocent, do you think he bought off twelve jurors? You know, the judge has no sentencing power, only sentencing power, and the final sentencing power is the twelve jurors. They are all local ordinary citizens, ranging in age from 19 to 79 years old. They are composed of four men and eight women, seven of whom are white, four of whom are Hispanic (the plaintiff is Hispanic), and one of whom is Asian. There were no black people, because prosecutors eliminated all black candidates, and how many people questioned whether this was fair to Jackson? ) They must be completely consistent to decide whether the defendant is guilty or not! If you think Jackson can buy them off, you're slandering them and mocking your own brain!

So why do they agree that Jackson is innocent? See below excerpts from the testimony of the plaintiff’s family.

If you were a juror and you read testimony like this, how would you decide?

Jian 7908

Transcript of the plaintiff’s testimony:

First of all, it is necessary to say that Michael Jackson was accused in this case The four charges:

1. Crime of child molestation (4)

2. Crime of attempted child molestation (1)

3. Provision to minors Alcohol crime (four counts)

IV. Conspiracy (1)

(Note: The so-called "conspiracy" refers to the prosecutor's accusation that Michael Jackson and 5 The assistants (who were all exempted from prosecution) conspired to kidnap the boy's family for the purpose of "child molestation". Among them, there were 28 "blatant crimes", which were "conspiracy crimes")

Chinese media. Coverage of the accuser's claims against Jackson in court. They can say whatever they want, but what about the defense attorney's cross-examination?

The following are excerpts from some scenes where the boy's family was cross-examined by the defense lawyer in court and their testimony was obviously contradictory and wrong, with comments.

The boy's younger brother, the "only witness" (for "providing alcohol to minors" and "child molestation"), said that when he and his family were guests at Michael's Utopia Manor, Michael gave him He and his brother brought them alcohol and showed them pornographic magazines. He also witnessed Michael's "sexual assault" on his brother twice. Both times, when Michael couldn't sleep in the middle of the night, he entered Michael's suite and stole from Michael's bedroom door. )

Scene 1: (The defense lawyer took out a pornographic magazine "Penthouse Edge", which is an adult publication legally published in the United States. The prosecution claimed that it was found under Michael's bed, and it had Michael and him on it. The younger brother's fingerprints. This is the prosecution's "important evidence" that Jackson used pornographic magazines to seduce boys)

Defense lawyer: Michael never showed you this pornographic magazine, right?

Boy brother: He showed it to me!

Defense lawyer: Are you sure?

Boy brother: Yes!

At this time, the defense lawyer turned to the jury and pointed out: This magazine was published in August 2003, and the last time the plaintiff’s family left Wuxiang Manor was in March 2003. How did Michael show the plaintiff's Boys & Brothers magazine the August 2003 issue before March 2003? !

The boy quickly changed his mind: Oh, I’m not talking about this one, but other similar magazines.

(There was an uproar in the court!)

Comment: British Sky TV News reported: The magazine will be a heavy blow to the prosecutor and the police. Because it looks like the magazine was framed. If proven true, the entire case will be dismissed! !

Scenario 2: (Alarm clock problem. Michael’s bedroom is equipped with an alarm clock. When someone approaches, the alarm clock will sound. The boy’s brother has twice seen Michael assaulting his brother in the bedroom, but the alarm Didn't alert Jackson)

Defense attorney: Did you turn off the alarm every time you entered that room?

Boy brother: Yes.

Defense attorney: Did you see Michael turn off the siren?

Boy’s brother: No.

Defense attorney: Do you hear the sirens every time you enter the room?

Boy brother: Yes.

DEFENSE ATTORNEY: So when you entered Michael's room twice and witnessed him molesting your brother, did the alarm go off?

Boy's brother: Yes... but if the door is closed, Michael can't hear you.

The door is closed and Michael can’t hear, so what’s the use of calling the police? If the door was closed, how did you get in? Little liar! ! )

Also, the boy's brother initially told police that Jackson gave them "red wine," but in court, it was changed to "white wine."

Comments: In a TV program about the case, a TV viewer said: "I think the younger brother was encouraged to say whatever he wanted to say. My mother once told me that in life , as long as you tell the truth, it will not change every time you tell it. If it is a lie, you will change it every time you tell it.

That's it for now. ”

Scene 1: (The plaintiff’s family said that Michael ordered his assistants to detain them in Wuxiang Manor, and then they “escaped” and “ran away” many times.)

Defense lawyer : Mr. Arvizo, your family spent a few weeks at Utopia for free, right?

Plaintiff Boy: Yes

Defense Attorney: Mr. Jackson paid for it. Food expenses, right?

Plaintiff Boy: Yes

Defense Attorney: Do you know that anyone else will pay for it?

Plaintiff Boy? : I don’t know. I’m pretty sure it’s Michael.

Defense attorney: You always go back and forth in a limousine, right?

Plaintiff boy: Yes. p>Defense lawyer: You rode in a Rolls-Royce once, didn't you?

Plaintiff boy: No, when Jesus and I escaped from Utopia, I just took a Rolls-Royce.

Defense lawyer: When you "ran away"?

Plaintiff boy: Yes

Defense lawyer: But then you went back - after you "ran away". How long?

A few days later, I guess.

Okay. Where did Jesus take you when you ran away? p>

Plaintiff Boy: He took me to my grandma’s house

Defense Lawyer: Two days later, you came back with Yao Yiqi?

Plaintiff Boy: I don’t know. Not two days, maybe a few days later

Defense attorney: So you came back and you "ran away" a second time, right?

Plaintiff boy: I think. Yes. Whatever.

Defense attorney: And then you "ran away" for the third time?

Plaintiff boy: No.

Defense lawyer: So, there seem to be three "escapes", right?

Plaintiff boy: I don't know.

Scenario 2: (Plaintiff boy admitted in court that he had. Tell the principal of his middle school that Michael "never did anything bad to him" )

Defense lawyer: He (the prosecutor) asked you if you disclosed the incident about Michael to Principal Alpert. Statement.

Plaintiff boy: I told Alpert that he (Michael) did not do anything bad to me. I told him twice as well. : Did you tell Alpert that Jackson never touched you inappropriately?

Plaintiff: Can’t remember.

Defense lawyer: Don’t you remember Jackson? Never touched you inappropriately?

Plaintiff Boy: Well, I'm sure because he was the principal

Defense Attorney: Mr. Alpert looked you in the eye. , asked Michael Jackson if he did anything to you, right?

Plaintiff Boy: I told him Michael didn't do anything to me

Defense Attorney: The second time you did it. Tell him, 'No, he didn't touch me inappropriately. 'Isn't it?

Plaintiff boy: I don’t know.

Defense lawyer: When did the conversation take place?

Plaintiff Boy: I believe it was after I came back from Utopia. (That is, after the so-called "sexual assault incident")

Defense lawyer: He (the principal) said: "Look at me, look at me... If you don't tell me the truth, I can't help Did something really happen to you? "Isn't it?

Plaintiff Boy: Yes.

Defense lawyer: Then your answer is that nothing happened?

Plaintiff Boy: Yes.

(There was an uproar in the court, and the prosecutor shook his head and sighed. The next day, the original boy explained that he did not tell the truth to the principal because he was embarrassed.)

Scene 3: (About being kidnapped)

Defense lawyer: Did you call the police at the hotel?

Plaintiff: No.

Defense lawyer: Did you ever shout for help when you went shopping?

Plaintiff: No.

Defense lawyer: Did you call the police when you were living at your grandma’s house?

Plaintiff: No.