The types of administrative compulsory measures mainly include:
(1) restricting the personal freedom of citizens;
(2) sealing up places, facilities or property;
(3) seizing property;
(4) Freezing deposits and remittances;
(5) Other administrative compulsory measures.
There are various administrative coercive measures in practice, which can be divided into three categories: restricting personal freedom, disposing of property, and entering houses and places.
According to the use of different occasions and the goals pursued, and taking into account the corresponding forms of administrative coercion, administrative coercive measures can be divided into the following three types or forms:
The first is the enforcement of compulsory measures.
Enforcement of compulsory measures is a compulsory measure taken by the administrative subject to urge the counterpart who fails to fulfill the obligations set by the specific administrative act to fulfill their obligations or reach the same state as fulfilling their obligations. It can also be called administrative compulsory measures, or even directly called administrative compulsory execution. In fact, administrative coercion is not so much an act as a process. In this process, the administrative subject takes corresponding compulsory measures and directly acts on the counterpart to ensure the realization of the obligation content. For this kind of administrative compulsory measure, the law also has the requirements of subject, method, procedure and time limit. Administrative coercion is a comprehensive summary of the whole process of taking administrative coercive measures, in which administrative coercive measures are still decisive and core measures. Because the purpose of taking this administrative compulsory measure is to realize the content of the obligation, it is used to be called administrative compulsory measure in theory and practice, and it should become a form or part of the whole administrative compulsory measure. It is illogical to exclude executive administrative coercive measures from administrative coercive measures.
Cases of seizure of administrative compulsory measures and administrative compensation
Is the State Administration of Taxation responsible for the implementation of tax administrative compulsory measures?
Is lien interrogation an administrative compulsory measure or a criminal investigation?
Chen v Pingyang county public security bureau (dispute over administrative compulsory measures)
Shanghai No.1 Company v. Municipal Salt Bureau (case of administrative compulsory measures)
Analysis on the present situation of administrative compulsory measures in China
Second, immediate coercive measures.
Immediate coercive measures are decisive actions taken by the administrative subject in an emergency to directly target the person, property or behavior of the relative person in order to remove emergency obstacles and eliminate emergency dangers. The decision and implementation of administrative immediate coercion are often carried out at the same time, and there is generally no time interval between them, so it is difficult to distinguish them. Therefore, in practice, the administrative subject takes decisive action, and the relative person perceives the means or measures to limit or influence their own rights and interests. This is the main reason why people generally do not distinguish between administrative immediate compulsory measures and administrative immediate compulsory measures. In addition, because immediate coercion is implemented in an emergency, its process is relatively short, the procedure is relatively simple, and there is no compulsory procedure, so administrative immediate coercion measures can almost be equivalent to administrative immediate coercion.