What is the definition of cross-examination? What is the purpose of witness cross-examination? Cross-examination refers to the cross-examination of witnesses or experts by one party and his lawyers

What is the definition of cross-examination? What is the purpose of witness cross-examination? Cross-examination refers to the cross-examination of witnesses or experts by one party and his lawyers in court. Black's Law Dictionary explains this concept as: "At a trial or hearing, an examination of a witness by a party opposite to the party calling the witness to testify. To understand the concept of cross-examination, one must pay attention to the following points: (1 ) Cross-examination is the questioning of witnesses by one party against the other party, and is adversarial in litigation. In criminal proceedings, the prosecutor's questioning of defense witnesses and the defender's questioning of prosecution witnesses are both cross-examinations; however, the prosecutor and the defense are both cross-examinations. A lawyer's questioning of his own witnesses does not constitute cross-examination. If it is offensive or rebuttal, it cannot reflect the essential characteristics of cross-examination. The target is "witnesses" in a broad sense, including defendants, victims, witnesses, appraisers, investigators, inspectors, and police officers who carry out search, seizure and other investigative measures. (4) Cross-examination should be conducted in court under the auspices of a judge. The police's questioning of witnesses or the interrogation of suspects during the investigation phase does not constitute cross-examination; the questioning of witnesses or defendants by prosecutors and defense lawyers outside the court does not constitute cross-examination. A very important form of evidence Although various methods have been developed to get witnesses to tell the truth, such as oaths and penalties for perjury, false testimony remains rampant in court, although deliberate perjury accounts for a large part of the problem. There are also many cases where the witness's memory is inaccurate due to the passage of time and other reasons. Whatever the reason, the witness always needs to be able to tell the truth through the use of evidence. No matter what the reason is, there is always a need for court arguments and cross-examination. The general purpose of cross-examining a witness is to eliminate falsehoods and keep the true. The credibility of witnesses (such as interests, biases, qualifications, etc.); (3) Obtaining testimony that is favorable to oneself (such as discrediting the testimony of other witnesses, corroborating the testimony of other witnesses that are favorable to oneself, and obtaining directly favorable testimony) ( Such as discrediting the testimony of other witnesses, obtaining directly favorable testimony, etc.). During the process of cross-examining the witness, the lawyer must control the witness and draw your argument, rather than letting the witness simply tell his or her own story. In litigation practice, the lawyer must control the witness. The basic method for the purpose of cross-examination is to attack weaknesses or flaws in the opponent's testimony