1, I have to say that it is a lawyer in a regular place, and the charging standard is reasonable. It is precisely because of this that the fees can be charged according to the standard, and the excess will be returned to the customer. In fact, the fees charged by lawyers in law firms are legal at present. So there is a certain order of rules to follow. If the lawyer's fee exceeds the standard, then at this time, the customer can really ask the lawyer to return the part that exceeds the standard, and at this time, the interests of the customer are safeguarded.
2. If the lawyer has stated before the service that the project that exceeds the fee will be charged for the second time, then this time is allowed in principle, and the excess part does not need to be returned. If there is indeed a second transaction between the lawyer and the client for some additional services, then at this time, after the lawyer's fee exceeds the principle standard, the fee for some additional services can also be increased. Therefore, the cost exceeding the standard is legal and compliant, and there is no need to return it to the customer.
3. It has to be said that, considering the relatively complicated specific scenarios, customers can choose to take reasonable litigation if they really think their interests are harmed. In fact, I have to say that in daily life, some lawyers' fees will also be controversial. For some customers, the interests will also be damaged, so it is necessary for us to distinguish specific scenarios. If the customer thinks that the lawyer's fee exceeds the standard, then he can also make a reasonable claim at this time.
In fact, it is really understandable that the lawyer's fee exceeds the standard. If both parties have acquiesced in principle, then there is no need to return the excess at this time. However, it is worth noting that if the lawyer increases some unnecessary fees without the knowledge of the client, then the fees that exceed the standard really need to be returned to the client.