1. court review: during the proceedings, the judge will review the evidence submitted. If the evidence is found to be doubtful or suspicious, the judge has the right to ask the party providing the evidence to provide more explanations or prove its authenticity. If the evidence is found to be false, the judge may refuse or exclude it, and may take corresponding legal measures against the party providing false evidence.
2. Case investigation: In some cases, lawyers or courts may investigate the act of providing false evidence. This may involve hiring professional investigators to collect and obtain evidence. If the investigation results confirm that the evidence is forged, the corresponding legal procedures will be initiated.
3. Legal sanctions: Providing false evidence is an illegal act, which may involve perjury, fraud or obstruction of obtaining evidence. If the evidence is found to be forged, the party providing false evidence may face legal sanctions, such as fines, criminal penalties or civil compensation.
4. Professional ethics responsibility: lawyers are representatives of the legal profession, and they have the obligation to abide by professional ethics. If a lawyer is suspected of providing false evidence, he may face the moral responsibility of the lawyer industry, such as being disqualified from practicing and being condemned or punished by the industry.
In a word, providing false evidence is a serious illegal act, which will have a serious negative impact on the fair trial and legal order of the case. When dealing with such cases, courts, lawyers and relevant institutions will take appropriate measures to ensure the fairness and justice of the law.
The legal measures to deal with forged evidence mainly include the following aspects. First of all, when trying a case, the court should strictly examine the authenticity and legality of the evidence, and thoroughly investigate and verify the evidence in doubt. Secondly, lawyers should raise objections in the course of defense or litigation, demand that forged evidence be excluded, and provide the court with the unreliability of the evidence. In addition, relevant legal institutions should establish and improve specialized institutions, strengthen the identification and inspection of evidence, and ensure the authenticity of evidence. For the act of forging evidence, the law should stipulate the corresponding criminal responsibility and civil liability for compensation to play a deterrent role. Finally, strengthen the legal education of the public, improve the public's awareness and vigilance of forging evidence, and reduce the occurrence of forging evidence. Through the comprehensive application of the above measures, we can better deal with the problem of forging evidence and maintain judicial justice and social order.
Legal basis:
Some Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation;
Article 11 When providing evidence to a people's court, a party shall provide the original or the original. If it is necessary to preserve the original and original evidence or it is really difficult to provide the original and original evidence, a copy or duplicate verified by the people's court may be provided.