Criminal trial meets dead lawyer

Add again:

1, after reading your last supplement, I feel that you are leaving, helpless and speechless, and the law is so fragile!

2. If you are still online, can you contact me? I want to ask you something.

Supplementary answer:

1, built such a high building, if the landlord finally does not adopt the closure problem, but I am sorry for the netizens, hehe.

2. Do you want to steal or set fire: both are suspected of committing crimes, and all have started to commit crimes, but they have failed. If there are other families around your warehouse, and they set fire, the crime may be heavier, and criminal responsibility should be investigated for arson. However, if there is no physical evidence or other evidence to prove that they started the fire, it will generally not be considered as arson.

3. About your dog:

(1) You keep large dogs without a license: It is illegal, but you should only be punished by public security.

(2) The dog is still yours, and you should be punished by public security, but it doesn't mean that the other party has the right to take your dog and sell it: if you have evidence that the dog was really taken and sold by the other party, you can claim compensation for the loss later or use the money that the dog was sold to offset the compensation.

1, "He said there was no conclusive evidence of stealing, but he didn't take out the things in the warehouse. So you can tell that you just stole something by opening the warehouse door in the middle of the night? " :

(1) This is no longer a question of theft preparation, but a theft has already started: the other party has prepared the stolen vehicle, assembled manpower, actually entered your yard and opened your warehouse. This is already an obvious theft, but it is attempted theft rather than preparation for theft (preparation for crime is a tool to prepare for crime, investigate the path of crime, etc.). According to the provisions of China's criminal law, it is necessary to investigate the preparatory offender and the attempted offender, but the attempted offender can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment, but the lighter or mitigated punishment for his criminal behavior cannot be based on not admitting that he is a thief and not denying that he is at fault.

(2) I suggest you: collect the evidence you said and don't get angry here, including: first, "the thief didn't know there were so many dogs in it." I didn't expect to kill him. That's what the living said. In fact, there are more than two of them, and there is a driver outside the wall. After hearing their screams, the man ran away. " The testimony of these two people can be a secret recording when you or others talk to them about this matter, or a written testimony that they agree to write to you (it seems difficult), or when they say this to others themselves, others can testify for you.

The second is the evidence that they entered your yard and opened the door of your warehouse at that time: if you called the police at that time, this part had better be recorded by the police; If not, you can find someone to testify for you. If only your workers testify for you, the probative power will be weak.

(3) Entering someone else's yard in the middle of the night and opening someone else's warehouse: it can be proved to be theft, but do you have any evidence to prove those facts you said? Without evidence, nothing can be said.

(4) Suggestion: After collecting relevant evidence, report the case to the local public security bureau. If it is not accepted, you can report it to the procuratorate.

2. "What is the basis of his claim for compensation of 600,000? Does the country have relevant documents? You can't just ask them. " :

(1) Why did he let you pay 600,000 yuan? Only he knows. Open your mouth or not, as long as he can understand.

(2) According to the law, the compensation you should bear includes: medical expenses, transportation expenses (you didn't have this expense when you were sent to the hospital) and death compensation (calculated according to the per capita disposable income of urban residents or the per capita net income of rural residents in your area in the previous year, calculated for 20 years). However, for those over 60 years of age, the age will be reduced by one year for each additional year; For those over 75 years of age, it is calculated as five years), the living expenses of the dependents (the per capita consumption expenditure of urban residents and the per capita annual living consumption expenditure of rural residents in the previous year). If the dependant is a minor, it shall be calculated at the age of eighteen; If the dependent has no ability to work and no other source of income, it shall be counted as 20 years. However, for those over 60 years of age, the age will be reduced by one year for each additional year; Seventy-five years of age or older, calculated by five years.

A supporter refers to a minor who should bear the obligation of support according to law or an adult close relative who has lost the ability to work and has no other source of income. If the dependents have other dependents, the compensation obligor shall only compensate the victim for the part that he should bear according to law. If there are several dependents, the total annual compensation shall not exceed the per capita consumption expenditure of urban residents or the per capita annual living consumption expenditure of rural residents in the previous year. ) and so on.

For details, please refer to Articles 19, 28 and 29 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases.

(3) The above compensation, because the deceased was at fault (theft), should reduce your liability for compensation.

3. "He said he would put me in prison. In fact, I am not afraid of going to jail at all. I just want to know that in my case, even if from ruin is established, even if it is illegal to keep a dog, how many years can I be sentenced? " :

(1) If you cause death through negligence, the maximum sentence is 7 years. However, the other party was killed by a dog for theft and should be given a lighter punishment.

Attachment: Article 233 of the Criminal Law: Whoever negligently causes death shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; If the circumstances are relatively minor, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.

(2) You don't belong to self-mourning: you rushed to the countryside and sent people to the hospital immediately after you got the news, and there was no self-mourning. Your workers and hospital doctors can prove it.

4, don't be impulsive, impulsive will make things worse. I suggest you find the media to expose it, or report it to the police at the next higher level.