1、
The review of the Tokyo trial has lost the noise and intrigue of the old city. I watched the movie "Tokyo Trial" with solemn and stirring feelings, and every student present was amazed by Judge Merrio's outstanding performance. There are several scenes that I remember vividly. 1 of "pa", Judge Mei resolutely sent a glass full of water to the ground, and the water spilled all over the floor, and the broken glass pieces were scattered in the surrounding corners, and they could no longer overlap. This move shocked the judges of all countries present and shocked every audience. He expressed his determination to seek justice for the people of China and not to execute war criminals. How many people today have the courage and wisdom to compete with powerful foreign forces? It doesn't matter what the order of appearances of countries is, but Judge Mei argued endlessly about it, even resigned as a judge, and finally let foreign judges compromise. Today, how many people can conflict with others on international occasions for such so-called "trivial matters" and dare to stand up and express their views? I was also moved by the Japanese soldier played by Ceng Zhiwei. The country is in chaos-the long island atomic bomb incident has just caused heavy losses to the Japanese people, and the national leader has been sent to a military court. Every Japanese youth is full of infinite hatred for foreign forces, and after learning the whole story, he knelt down one after another, cut himself off by laparotomy, and even cursed Japanese militarism and killed his brother, which was in sharp contrast with another Japanese youth. This spirit of distinguishing right from wrong has almost disappeared in today's society. Patriotism has been reversed countless times in various textbooks and media. What is true patriotism? I'm confused. I remember going for a spring outing in primary school. Students saw a group of children who seemed to speak Japanese cursing on the roadside. I remember seeing countless posts insulting Japan on the Internet. I feel very sad. Is this patriotism? Our children born in peacetime have never experienced the grief of being insulted and disabled by others. The right and wrong of the previous generation seems to be far away from us. Now, we blame the new generation of foreign countries who are also confused about what happened in the past with the feeling that they have not been given new words. What would we think if we were them? When is the time to repay kindness? The grievances of the previous generation need to be settled, but we are by no means a new generation. We should not live in an era of hatred. We should welcome every day with a healthy and upward attitude, which is what the country expects. I believe that many viewers will rekindle their patriotism and increase their hatred for the Japanese people after watching this film, but my intuition tells me that this is by no means the expected result of the film. Patriotism is definitely not endless hatred and contempt for other countries. Instead, we should learn from the film that Judge Mei Ruxuan is neither humble nor humble in the handover with foreign forces, resolutely safeguard national dignity, stand up at critical moments and shout: "I am not a soldier, I am a judge, a judge in China!"
2、
Tokyo Trial-A must-see for China people. Why? Focusing on its name and thinking about its content is enough for me and many people in China to have an inexplicable antipathy and patriotic impulse. Just half an hour ago, I was quietly enjoying this movie in the cinema. Now, when I first got home and did nothing, I turned on my computer and began to record my feelings and thoughts. This is a memory worth leaving.
Generally speaking, this is a work that disappoints me. When I watched the movie, I was very much looking forward to it because of the indignation and passionate speeches of several protagonists. However, when you sit in the cinema and feel with your heart, there is only a frivolous feeling in the whole process. Knowing that these histories are enough to make people feel depressed and stinging, but the weight of these histories is stuck in their throats, lacking destructive impact, which makes these weights instantly overweight and even slowly precipitate-however, no! ! ! In the whole process, I didn't feel the sadness and hatred brought by Japanese militarism and aggression, and the ensuing killing and bloodshed. I don't feel the collision and outbreak of historical events in various countries, I don't feel punished for crimes, and I show the pleasure and excitement of peace.
In a word, lack-shock. The film is from China judge Meru? Taking H as the breakthrough point, it focuses on some nodes in the whole trial process, and also interspersed with the love affair between China journalists and Japanese journalists, some Japanese consciousness, some Japanese youth's misinterpretation of the war, hatred and revenge against China, the shadow and regret left by Japanese veterans after the war, and the fear of Japanese women being insulted in response to the call of the country in the war.
The key plot that impressed me deeply: 1. Meiru at the beginning of the trial? Strive for a trial seat; First, two drunken Japanese were shot and killed by American drivers; First, Puyi's testimony; First, the American judge questioned tojo hideki, and finally tojo hideki stubbornly admitted that he would continue the war of aggression if possible; One is the scene where the Japanese proprietress was killed by a bullet; Finally, vote on the circumstances of the death penalty.
However, it is these key plots that make me less satisfied. These plots are not deep and delicate enough to make people unable to put their feelings into it. Even an audience full of anger and ready to devote themselves to emotion can't precipitate their feelings. In fact, there is always a bright spot in the whole movie. There are two recognized masters, DAMIAN LAU and Ceng Jiang. Don't worry that they can't express these emotions. However, I don't know whether it is the screenwriter or the director. These emotional actors are all expounding some empty rhetoric and have no strength at all. It's like a big fist hitting you, making you tremble and scared, but it doesn't hurt as much as you think.
I don't know if the director's angle is too objective. He tried his best to incite the audience with emotions, so that there were emotional contradictions in the filming. The real historical film that runs through the whole film and the subtitles that appear constantly make this film more like a documentary. People have an uncomfortable feeling of being tickled but unable to laugh. It looks like an explosion, but it's like a throat. Go up, can't go up; Get down! Get down!
There is another mistake, that is, the whole emotional line is focused on "The Trial of China". Judge China contended for seats, and Judge China persuaded everyone to agree to the death penalty. It seems that the whole trial was dominated by China people, and China people used most of their strength to suppress and retaliate against the Japanese. It is easy to mislead ideas and emotions.
Actor: First of all, Puyi's appearance should be a breakthrough. In this plot, we should let Puyi tell the truth from the heart in a calm and simple tone, but Puyi's performance is more like a show, with a lot of flashy hooligans and hypocrites; Secondly, the memory of the "thief" monk is correct, but the content of his memory can't make others feel the pain and trembling in front of them. It is necessary to change the content and continue to be delicate; Third, the questioning of tojo hideki by American lawyers is a very good part, with feelings and content; And Japanese defense lawyers. It may be better to make his defense more despicable and cunning ... There are many similar small characters, but they all have a common problem-not delicate, not in-depth, but bold description, as well as the impulse of the performers, can never make people emotional.
However, the strength of these performers is worthy of recognition. Except for Zhu Xiaotian's lack of acting skills, other people's performances, including small roles, are in place. Moreover, these actors are more in line with the real people in history from appearance to temperament, and there is not much difference in casting, which can be praised.
In addition, there is a sense of discontinuity between the pictures in the film, and there are even signs of fracture in some places. For example, in the scene of tojo hideki's trial, the camera is aimed at tojo hideki's head, which seems to be frozen, and then the next scene is directly cut to the face of an American lawyer. If you push it down from the top and then slowly transition to the lawyer's face, the effect will be very good. I don't know how the director made such a big omission. Obviously, the producers and editors didn't do well, or at least didn't do enough.
In short, I think this film should have been more exciting than it is now. The actors' performances are generally good, the sound effects are still weighty, and the picture is still exquisite. But the script is obviously not written in place, the entrance is not in place, but the exit is very open; Directors, producers and editors are also very scarce. The whole film is really calm, and there will be a feeling of cowardice. However, the significance and intention of this film are still good, and I hope to expose the truth of history to the international community through publicity such as movies. However, successors of similar works should really think about the depth and strength of the script and don't waste these excellent actors.
Finally, considering the unreality of dubbing, I think it is better to watch the original movie again. Maybe the unprocessed voice will be more powerful than dubbing.