The highly publicized case of Song Shanmu's alleged rape began in a low-key trial the day before yesterday. First identified Song Shanmu Luo Yun (a pseudonym) testified in court, Song Shanmu in the court to maintain the previous statement, said Luo Yun "voluntary", "for money" and have sex with him, Luo Yun angrily refuted, and was persuaded to leave. The trial lasted a full day, many say, the case may no longer be in session, Shenzhen Luohu District People's Court or will choose a day to directly pronounce judgment.
Closed-door hearing seat empty
September 16, 2010, the Luohu District Procuratorate to the Luohu District Court filed a public prosecution, that should be held criminally liable for the crime of rape of the defendant Song Shanmu, Luoyun incidental to the application for civil damages; a month after the incident, the case quietly opened, before and after the hearing were not notified to the media.
Denial of the allegations
October 18, Luohu Court hearing the case. Because the rape case involves personal privacy, the court did not open the hearing. According to sources, the day of the trial, in addition to the trial judge, public prosecutor, bailiffs, the defendant Song Shanmu, the victim Luo Yun and lawyers on both sides of the litigation participants, no one else to listen to the proceedings. The trial went on all day, the court conducted an investigation and debate, the defendant's final statement, the presiding judge announced adjournment, did not pronounce judgment. The court, Song Shanmu denied the prosecution accused of rape in court, arguing that he and Luo Yun sex, is out of mutual consent, Luo Yun is for financial gain and consent. However, Song Shanmu's defense was refuted in court by Luo Yun.
Trial results
Dec. 24, 3 p.m., shocked the nation's Shanmu training president Song Shanmu suspected of rape in Shenzhen City Luohu Court of First Instance, sentenced the defendant Song Shanmu 4 years in prison, the execution period from May 12, 2010 Song Shanmu surrender date, until May 11, 2014, and pay the plaintiff-victim Liu a variety of costs, a total of 4205.87 yuan; for the other victim Li's request, the court for unclear facts, insufficient evidence is not supported. Sentencing court, the two plaintiff victims did not appear in court.