Many evidences submitted show that there are serious mistakes in the execution date of Nie Shubin's death penalty. Nie was tortured to extract a confession during the investigation stage, and Nie's signature in the file was forged in many places.
Nie's execution date has made a major mistake.
According to the file, Nie Shubin was executed on April 27th, 1995. According to the meteorological data of Shijiazhuang Meteorological Bureau, the temperature on that day was 25.8 degrees Celsius. However, the photos of the execution showed that Nie Shubin was kneeling in the snow in a down jacket, and everyone at the scene was wearing winter clothes. According to meteorological data, there were only two snowfalls from April 1995 to February 1996, 10/3 to February 16.
In addition, there is a criminal appeal written by Nie Shubin in the file, with the signature date of 1995 May 13, which was verified by the collegiate panel of Nie case of Shandong High Court, proving that the appeal was signed by Nie Shubin himself.
To sum up the above two points, Li Shuting thinks that the actual execution date of Nie Shubin is after 1996 65438+ 10/3, and it will not be1April 27, 995 as shown in the case file.
The inmates proved that Nie had been tortured to extract a confession.
At the hearing, Li Shuting also submitted the testimony of Ji Moumou, who was in prison with Nie Shubin. Ji Moumou is currently serving his sentence in Baoding Prison. He is more advanced than Nie Shubin in detention center. According to his memory, Nie Shubin was quiet and talkative, especially thin. Because they are similar in age, they often chat and talk. The most common communication between the two is that they were tortured to extract confessions. Ji Moumou said that Nie Shubin told him that he was tortured to extract a confession.
Besides, according to Nie Shubin's mother Zhang Huanzhi, Nie Shubin was crying all the time when she saw his lawyer during the first trial. The lawyer asked him why he didn't admit rape and murder for the first time. Nie said nothing, and asked him why he admitted it for the second time. Nie said, "I can't beat Li."
On-site case handling record place name "crossing"
Before the trial, Li Shuting and Chen Guangwu found that at least six signatures in the files of the first trial and the second trial were suspected of forgery. These include Nie Shubin's signature on the transcript of the indictment served in the first instance, the signature on the receipt after the indictment transcript is served, the signature on the transcript of the first instance trial, the signature on the receipt of the first instance judgment, the signature on the receipt of the second instance criminal judgment, and the signature on the identity verification before execution.
Before the lawyer applied for authentication, the Shandong High Court had authenticated all the signatures of Nie Shubin and his family in the case file, and confirmed that the signatures were forged.
In addition, a field record signed on August 1994 and 12 has the names of Xinhua Road and Xinhua West Road, and the name of this section was originally "Shi Huo South Road" or "Shi Huo Highway". According to the data of Shijiazhuang Geographical Names Office, "Xinhua Road" only existed among the people in 200 1 year. Li Shuting believes that this on-site transcript was formed after 200 1 year, which is a fraud.
Adopt double standards on the Wang Shujin issue.
Li Shuting believes that in Nie's case, no one found or accused Nie Shubin of committing rape or murder, and the public security organs locked Nie Shubin as a suspect and arrested him just because he rode a blue mountain bike, without any criminal facts and evidence.
Li Shuting said that there were neither direct witnesses nor direct material evidence in the Nie Shubin case, and the judgment of the second instance was made only by Nie Shubin's confession; Nie's confession is self-contradictory and full of loopholes in terms of time, place, process and killing tools.
Regarding Wang Shujin's case, Li Shuting believes that Wang Shujin's confession in the western suburb cornfield case was not influenced by any external information sources, and he pleaded guilty voluntarily. According to his confession, whether it is the time, place and process of committing the crime, or the appearance of the victim and the place where the clothes were buried, it is unique and exclusive. In particular, the confession of the hidden details of the victim's key left at the crime scene shows more that this case was committed by Wang Shujin.
Li Shuting believes that in the trial of Wang Shujin's case, the courts at all levels in Hebei refused to confirm Wang Shujin's repeated confession in the western suburb cornfield case, and adopted double standards in the identification of criminal facts and evidence.