That was 1996, the second crackdown in China after the reform and opening up. During the strike-hard period, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) adopted the Decision on Prompt Trial Procedure for Criminals Seriously Endangering Social Security with 1983, which stipulated: "Criminals who seriously endanger social security, such as murder, rape, robbery and explosion, should be sentenced to death. If the main criminal facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive, and the masses are extremely angry, they should be brought to trial in time, and the application of Article/kloc-0 of the Criminal Procedure Law can be exempted. This decision is to crack down on crime "severely and quickly".
"Female toilet hooligans kill people" is the focus of crackdown during the crackdown. Under the instruction of "fast-oriented", the Huggieler model took only 62 days from the case to the execution.
1On May 3, 1996, just before the trial of the Hugue Gilles pattern was about to begin, the "strike hard" struggle group of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region inspected Hohhot, stressing that the struggle was "tight in time and heavy in task" and instructing the political and legal departments of Hohhot, especially the public security organs, to give full play to the spirit of "one is not afraid of hardship, and the other is not afraid of death" and set an example for the whole region.
Under the instruction of "strike hard", the public security took the lead. Because of the tight time, some police officers have low quality, "extorting confessions by torture is a common practice." During the "strike hard" period, once a major case occurs, the public security is still investigating, and the arrest department of the procuratorate can intervene in order to "quickly arrest". The subsequent "fast appeal" was logical, and the case reached the court almost unsupervised.
A reporter of a certain media once obtained a transcript of the case of calling before 18, and the recording time was19: 20 pm on May 7, 1996, that is, one month before he was shot. The interrogators are prosecutors Liu and Peng of Hohhot Procuratorate. The person questioned was Hugue Gilletu, claiming that he was innocent. In this * * * seven-page, 1500-word transcript, Hugue Gilletu said several times: "What I said today was true, and what I said at the beginning was also true ... Later, the people of the public security bureau insisted that I do what they said and wouldn't let me relieve myself ... They said that as long as I said I killed someone, I could go to pee. ...
When describing "the fact that he committed a crime that night", Hugue Gilletu made the following statement: "I called Yan Feng to the toilet that night to see if the woman was dead ... Later, I knew that she was actually dead, so I ran away ... The characteristics of her autumn clothes were after I had no choice ... Guess, I guess ... I didn't pinch the woman ..."
After Hugue Gilletu pleaded guilty, he quickly completed the relevant arrest, prosecution, first instance and second instance, including the execution of the death penalty, in accordance with the requirements of "strike hard" and "severely and quickly", and completed all legal procedures in two months.
1On May 23, 1996, at the trial of first instance, Johnny, a lawyer hired by 1500 yuan, pleaded guilty, and Ding Shoujun, a lawyer hired by 500 yuan, appeared in court to defend without saying a word.
On May 23rd, the presiding judge Su Ming announced that the defendant Hugue Gilletu was sentenced to death. After the death penalty was announced, Hugue Gilletu refused to accept it and appealed. On June 5, the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region made a final judgment, "rejecting the appeal and upholding the original judgment" and "approving the ruling that Hugue Gilletu was sentenced to death for intentional homicide and deprived of political rights for life". 10 June Hugue Gilletu was executed.