What's the name of Liao's son?

(2022) No.6549, Jing 03 Minzhong

Appellant (plaintiff in the original trial): ** 1, male,1born on September 7, 984, Han nationality, living in Luyi County, Henan Province.

Authorized Agent: He Guihua, lawyer of Beijing Shourun Law Firm.

Appellee (defendant in the original trial): China Construction No.1 Bureau Group Construction Development Co., Ltd., with its domicile at No.0/7, Wanghua Road West Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing.

Legal Representative: Liao, board chairman.

Agent ad litem: Tian Xueqi, male,/kloc-0, born on April 7, 1998.

Appellee (defendant in the original trial): Beijing Yalin World Expo Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., whose address is Floor 5 1 of Yard 70, Yangzhuang Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing.

Legal Representative: Lin Shan, board chairman.

Agent ad litem: Liu Shiqi, male, born in June 1990.

Appellee (defendant in the original trial): Beijing Zhengqi Architectural Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd., whose domicile is DY 197, Building 4, No.5 Ping 'an Road, Shilong Economic Development Zone, Mentougou District, Beijing.

Legal Representative: Zhu Guozhong, general manager.

Agent ad litem: Ma 1, male,1born on September 23rd, 980.

Appellee (defendant in the original trial): Ma 1, male,1born on September 23rd, 980, Han nationality, living in Haidian District, Beijing.

Appellee (defendant in the original trial): **7, male,1987 65438+/kloc-0, born on October 7th, Han nationality, living in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

Appellant ** 1 was involved in a dispute over the victim's liability with appellee China Construction No.1 Engineering Group Construction Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as China Construction Company), Beijing Yalin World Expo Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Yalin Company), Beijing Zhengqi Building Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zhengqi Company), Ma 1 and **7.

** 1 Appeal request: 1. Cancel the first and second items of the first-instance judgment and change the judgment according to law; 2. The acceptance fee and appraisal fee for the first and second trial of this case shall be borne by China Construction Company, Yalin Company, Zhengqi Company, Ma 1 and **7. Facts and reasons: The court of first instance made obvious mistakes in the identification of the fact of ** 1 injury and the division of responsibilities. ** 1 In the process of carrying things, I accidentally fell from the window, resulting in injury, which was not caused by jumping out of the window. Because China Construction Company, Yalin Company, Zhengqi Company, Mamou 1 and **7 failed to take any necessary protective measures for dangerous sections on the construction site, ** 1 was injured, and should be mainly responsible. The court of first instance only used horses.