Why do you want to use a ruling instead of a judgment when the original judgment is upheld in the second instance of a criminal case?

1. First of all, in the application of judgment, ruling and judgment, the judgment solves the substantive problems of the case; Ruling is to solve procedural problems and some substantive problems in litigation, and all procedural problems are maintained, so ruling is used; Changing the first-instance judgment involves substantive issues and requires the use of the judgment.

2, the clear provisions of the law.

Article 189 of the Criminal Procedure Law clearly stipulates that there are mainly the following situations:

1. If the facts and applicable laws are found to be correct in the first instance, the ruling shall be rejected and the original judgment upheld;

2. If the facts are found to be correct in the first instance, but the applicable law is wrong or the sentence is improper, the sentence shall be changed;

3. If the facts are unclear or the evidence is insufficient in the first instance, the original judgment may be revoked and sent back for retrial; You can also adopt a judgment and directly change the judgment.