As for whether the woman who kept her dog without a leash and scared a male passerby will be seriously injured and hospitalized, the final result is still unclear because it is still being processed. However, relevant units will definitely deal with it seriously in accordance with the law. The bystander who was beaten can also ask the other party to bear relevant responsibilities and pay corresponding compensation through legal channels.
1.0 ?Dogs are inferior to people, this is the approach of some dog owners. This approach ultimately makes them less than dogs. Before answering this question, I read the answers from other responders. There is a case of a respondent: a couple walked their dog without a leash, and the dog ran back and forth on the road. People passing by were annoyed and drove the puppy away with their feet. As a result, the dog owners (the couple) actually asked the man passing by to apologize to their dog.
Apologise to the dog! The man passing by will definitely refuse to do it and refuse to apologize. In this way, a dispute broke out between the two parties. It probably meant that when a man passed by, the couple simply held hands. It's my own fault (walking the dog without a leash), and I'm unreasonably asking people to apologize to the dog. If they don't win, I'll do it. This is what dog owners (enthusiasts) do.
Another respondent’s case was that a male passerby went to pick up a courier, but a dog ran over, barked at him, and appeared to be attacking. The dog is so vicious that the courier cannot take it away. In desperation, the male passerby tried to drive the dog away. But the dog refused to leave and tried to attack him.
The unhappy male passerby couldn't help but curse a few times, saying that the dog owner was unqualified for walking the dog without a leash. As a result, the scolding directly angered the dog owner. The two men started fighting without saying a few words. The male passerby was clearly defeated and ended up with serious injuries that required hospitalization. Dogs bark at people, regardless of their owners. After others say a few words, they will come out and beat them. That’s what dog owners do.
There are more and worse situations, which I won’t go into here. From the above two cases alone, we can know that in the eyes of some dog owners: dogs are taller than people, and people are inferior to dogs! For them, it is their freedom to walk their dogs as they please, and it is the dog's right to offend and scare others. As for people, they can only swallow their anger. If you can't stand it, keep fighting until you can.
It is undeniable that there are indeed many qualified dog owners. They will take good care of their dogs when walking them, and they will also take good care of their dogs' poop. But some dog owners do it very poorly. Dogs can be divided into loyal dogs and vicious dogs, and so can dog owners. Sometimes they are unreasonable and dogs are worse than them.
2.0 ?Why do some dog owners have it? Are humans inferior to dogs? From what perspective? If you analyze this issue, it is very complicated. They have this perspective and each has their own reasons. But to sum up, it probably has something to do with their income level and their affinity for dogs, and they never consider problems from their own perspective, let alone put themselves in other people's shoes.
Let’s talk about income level first. Generally speaking, the income level of dog owners (pet dogs) is relatively high. Ordinary workers are exhausted from eating three meals a day and have no time or money to raise a dog. Many times, some people with high incomes have a sense of superiority, and so do some dog owners. This is the economic basis why they are somewhat inferior to dogs.
Let’s talk about emotional investment. The so-called pets (dogs) are mainly to satisfy spiritual needs. This means that people have a lot of emotional investment in keeping pets. Dog owners (pets) are bound to put a lot of affection into their dogs. In reality, I have seen too many dog ??owners name their dogs Zai Zai (zai means son in Cantonese), hug their dogs and kiss them crazily, eat and sleep together, etc.
Because these dog owners have invested so much emotion, time and material in their dogs, they regard their dogs as treasures. Whenever someone offends their dog, or even before the offense occurs, they become hysterical, rabid-dog-like, and unreasonable. Don't think my words are excessive.
Previously, a dog breeder in Hangzhou broke human bones. He was a typical hysterical, like a mad dog, making trouble without reason.
The story goes like this: Ms. Xu was taking her 6-year-old son and 3-year-old daughter for a walk in the community. Suddenly, a puppy barked at his son, which frightened his 6-year-old son into barking too. The dog owners (two couples) stood aside and turned a blind eye. In desperation, Ms. Xu had to drive the puppy away with her feet.
At this time, the dog owner was unwilling and ran over to scold Ms. Xu for kicking his son (he regarded the dog as his son). Ms. Xu was too angry to refute. As a result, the dog owner directly beat the person, and Ms. Xu quickly picked up the two children and ran away. But the dog owner did not let go and continued to chase and beat Ms. Xu, even knocking the two children to the ground.
This is the demeanor of a dog owner in Hangzhou. In fact, their behavior is worse than that of dogs. Here, I do not intend to accuse others of raising dogs (pets). But for some low-quality dog ??owners, they really should reflect on it. Dogs can be ignorant and they can bark at people, but as a dog owner, they cannot be ignorant or make trouble unreasonably.
I hope the country will strictly legislate against the barbaric behavior of dog owners. We also hope that relevant departments will severely punish the behavior of dog owners who raise dogs wildly. I believe that there is no room for unreasonable dog owners to be brutal after walking their dogs on a leash. Dogs will always be dogs and people will always be people. No matter how precious a dog is, it is not as good as the most ordinary person.