The crime of trust can be established unilaterally, as long as it meets the constitutive requirements of the crime. According to the law, the knowledge of the crime of helping letters should be judged according to the evidence materials, and the knowledge of the crime of helping letters should be judged from the following three aspects:
1. From the intentional point of view, knowing the crime of trusting should be a summary of knowing it intentionally, that is, knowing the criminal act committed by the aided person, but not asking what kind of crime it constitutes;
2. From the attribute of cognition, cognition is both realistic cognition and objective cognition to help people believe in crime;
3. From the perspective of knowing, knowing is certain knowing. If you only have a certain degree of reasonable doubt or vague understanding that others may commit crimes, it cannot be considered as knowing in helping others believe in crimes.
After bail pending trial for the crime of aiding the letter, the general judgment is as follows:
1. If there are illegal facts, provide them with technical support such as Internet access, server hosting, network storage, communication and transmission, or provide them with help such as advertising promotion, payment and settlement, knowing that others use information networks to commit crimes. If the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and shall also or only be fined;
2. If there are no illegal facts, or if the circumstances of the crime are minor, administrative punishment may be imposed according to the actual situation.
I hope the above questions can help you. If you have other legal questions, please consult a professional lawyer.
Legal basis: Article 75 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the people's court shall, in combination with other evidence in this case, examine and determine whether it can be used as the basis for ascertaining the facts.
The refusal of the parties to state the case does not affect the people's court's determination of the facts of the case on the basis of evidence.
Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China
Article 60 Anyone who knows the circumstances of a case has the obligation to testify.
A person who is physically and mentally defective or young, can't distinguish right from wrong and can't express correctly, can't be a witness.
Article 59 The testimony of a witness must be cross-examined and verified by the public prosecutor, the victim, the defendant and the defender in court before it can be used as the basis for finalizing the case. If the court finds that a witness intentionally perjures or conceals criminal evidence, it shall deal with it according to law.