Case 1: When Xiao Kong, Xiao Jian, Xiao Lu and Xiao Liu were studying in a middle school in Beijing, they had a dispute over trivial matters. Xiao Kong suggested to Dadong and Xiao Zhang that they buy knives to retaliate against Xiao Lu and others, and the three of them bought six knives. After buying the knife, Xiao Kong called Xiao Lu and Xiao Liu to make an appointment. Hou Xiaokong and Dadong, together with Xiao Zhang, Xiao Sundao and Xiao Jian, gathered more than 30 people, armed with sticks and others. *** Together we came to an overpass and waited on both sides of the bridge for Xiao Lu and others to come and challenge. When Xiao Lu and Xiao Liu gathered many people and arrived armed with sticks and other objects, the two sides faced off with weapons. During this period, many people were injured, with varying degrees of severity.
The judge said: Most of the people involved in the fights in this case were adults, and Xiaokong and Dadong were minors. Xiaokong and Dadong held a public riot and gathered many people to fight with weapons. Their actions constituted the crime of mass affray. Xiaokong was the ringleader and Dadong was an active participant and should be punished according to law. Xiaokong and Dadong were eventually sentenced respectively for affray.
Case 2: Xiao Mao and Xiao Xia were both students at a vocational high school in Beijing. One day, after drinking at Xiao Mao’s house, they met Daming in a remote place not far from Xiao Mao’s house. Xiao Mao said that Da Ming had always had conflicts with him and proposed to fight against Da Ming together. Xiao Mao and Xiao Xia used iron pipes to beat Daming on the head and other parts of the body, and continued to chase and beat Daming to death. That night, Xiao Mao returned to the scene of the incident and after confirming Daming's death, he buried Daming.
The judge said: Xiao Mao and Xia deliberately and illegally deprived others of their lives and caused their deaths. Their actions constituted the crime of intentional homicide. The nature of the crime was egregious, the circumstances and consequences were particularly serious, and they should be punished in accordance with the law. Xiao Mao and Xia were sentenced to death for intentional homicide.
Case 3: Xiao Zhong, a 16-year-old middle school student in Beijing, registered on a social networking site with false identity information, interacted with underage girls, and used verbal threats to force multiple underage girls to have sex and He took nude photos, beat the victim multiple times, and threatened to post the nude photos online.
The judge said: Xiao Zhong ignored national law and used coercion to forcefully have sexual relations with multiple underage women multiple times, violating women's personal rights. His behavior constituted the crime of rape and should be punished. Xiao Zhong was held criminally responsible for rape.
Case 4: Xiaobai is a student from a middle school in Beijing. Xiaobai's mother divorced Xiaobai's biological father in her early years and has been living with Li. Li has had a bad temper for many years and often beat Xiaobai and his mother. One day, after Li beat Xiaobai's mother again, Xiaobai's mother beat Li to death with a hammer at home. Xiaobai knew it was his mother who did it, but he still helped his mother clean up the blood stains at the scene. During the investigation by the public security organ, Xiaobai took the initiative to confess the crime facts of assisting his mother to destroy the crime scene and destroy the criminal evidence.
The judge said: When Xiaobai witnessed his mother killing Li, he helped his mother clean up the scene and cover up the facts of the crime. The circumstances were serious. His behavior constituted the crime of helping to destroy evidence and should be punished according to law. Since Xiaobai was a minor when he committed the crime and his criminal behavior has not yet been discovered by the judicial authorities, if he proactively and truthfully confesses his criminal behavior, he should be deemed to have surrendered, so his punishment will be reduced in accordance with the law. At the same time, Xiaobai was instigated by his mother to commit the crime. His subjective viciousness is not deep, he has a good attitude towards pleading guilty and shows remorse, so he can be considered as a lenient punishment. Bai was sentenced to criminal punishment for helping to destroy evidence.
Case 5: Xiao Wen and Xiao Gong both like to keep pets, especially unique and rare pets, so they can show off to their classmates, but neither of them has money to buy them in a pet store. After planning, the two decided to go to the pet shop to steal pets. In the middle of the night, the two men carried the tools of the crime and entered the victim's pet shop by picking the lock. They stole three American monitor lizards, two Cuban anoles, and one West African monitor lizard. After identification, these pets were worth RMB 25,000. Yu Yuan.
The judge said: After the trial, the court held that Xiao Wen and Xiao Gong secretly stole other people's property and a huge amount for the purpose of illegal possession, infringing all rights of others' property, and constituted the crime of theft. Moreover, it is ****, the same crime, and should be punished in accordance with the law. According to the specific sentencing circumstances of the two people, the court sentenced them in accordance with the law.