What is the court procedure of the crime of forced trading?

The process is as follows: 1. Announce the trial phase 1. The presiding judge will know whether the parties appear in court. Check the defendant's name, nationality, native place, date of birth, education level, occupation, address and criminal history one by one, and whether the indictment has been received. If the defendant is a minority who does not know Chinese, he should be provided with an interpreter. If the defendant is under the age of 18, he shall notify his guardian to appear in court and appoint a defense lawyer for him. If the defendant does not receive the indictment or does not receive the indictment within 10 days, the trial will be postponed. 2. Publish the source of the case. Inform the parties that today the court is trying a suspected crime of someone prosecuted by a procuratorate. 3. Announce the names of members of the collegial panel, clerks, prosecutors, defenders, agents ad litem, appraisers and translators; Inform the parties that they have the right to apply for the withdrawal of members of the collegial panel, clerks, public prosecutors, expert witnesses and translators; Inform the defendant of his right to defense. 4. Inform the defendant of his rights. Including the right to apply for withdrawal, the right to defense, the right to submit evidence, the right to apply for new witnesses to appear in court, the right to apply for new evidence, the right to apply for re-appraisal, the right to re-examine and the right to make a final statement. 5. Ask the defendant whether to apply for withdrawal. If the reasons for the defendant's application for withdrawal comply with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the court shall be adjourned. Report to the president or the attorney general for decision. If the reasons for the application do not conform to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the presiding judge shall reject it in court. 6. Declare whether the case is heard in public and explain the reasons. 7. Declare court discipline. Second, the court investigation stage 1. The prosecutor read out the criminal indictment. Plaintiff in incidental civil action reads out the indictment in incidental civil action. 2. If multiple defendants are interrogated separately, the court will leave only one defendant for interrogation, and the other defendants will withdraw from the court. First of all, the defendant himself stated his opinions on the indictment. The prosecution and the defense cross-examined the defendant. The order of interrogation is public prosecutor, victim, plaintiff in incidental civil action, defender and agent ad litem. The judge can also interrogate the defendant. 3. When a witness or expert witness is required to testify, the judge shall inform him of the legal responsibility for truthfully providing testimony and intentionally perjury or concealing criminal evidence. Public prosecutors, parties, defenders and agents ad litem may, with the permission of the presiding judge, put questions to witnesses and expert witnesses. When the presiding judge thinks that the content of the question is irrelevant to the case, he shall stop it. A judge may question witnesses and expert witnesses. Witnesses and expert witnesses are not allowed to attend the trial. 4. Public prosecutors and defenders presenting evidence shall present material evidence to the court for identification by the parties. Documents as evidence, such as transcripts of testimony of witnesses who did not appear in court, expert conclusions of appraisers and transcripts of inquests, shall be read out in court. A judge shall listen to the opinions of the public prosecutor, parties, defenders and agents ad litem. During the court hearing, if the collegial panel has doubts about the evidence, it may announce an adjournment to investigate and verify the evidence. When investigating and verifying evidence, the people's court may conduct an inquest, inspection, seizure, appraisal, inquiry and freezing. 5. The presiding judge who applied for a new certificate asked the defendant, "Is there any new evidence to show?" The parties, defenders and agents ad litem have the right to apply for notifying new witnesses to appear in court, for obtaining new material evidence, and for re-appraisal or inspection. The court shall make a decision on whether to approve the above application. 6. Apply for someone with specialized knowledge to appear in court. Prosecutors, parties, defenders and agents ad litem may apply to the court to notify people with specialized knowledge to appear in court and express their opinions on the expert opinions. The court shall make a decision on whether to approve the above application. This is an added procedure in the new criminal procedure law implemented this year. Third, the court debate stage 1. The presiding judge announced the end of the court investigation and the beginning of the court debate. 2. The public prosecutor issued a public prosecution statement. The victim complained. 4. Statement and defense of the defendant. 5. The defender made a defense statement. 6. Debate with each other. 7. During the debate, new facts that may affect the judgment were discovered, and the presiding judge announced to stop the debate and conduct a new court investigation. 8. After the debate on the criminal part, the prosecution and the defense debated on the civil part. 9. The defendant made a final statement. Four, the court mediation stage, the presiding judge asked whether the parties involved in the incidental civil litigation are willing to mediate. If both parties request mediation, the court may mediate the incidental civil action. If there are no incidental criminal proceedings or one party is unwilling to accept mediation, mediation will not be conducted. V. Comments and sentences 1. The Chief Justice announced an adjournment. Both the prosecution and the defense hand over the evidence to the court. 3. The parties check the record and sign it. 4. Members of the collegial panel comment on the opinions of both the prosecution and the defense. The deliberations were held in secret. 5. If the members of the collegial panel have major differences or disagree with the opinions of the collegial panel, they shall be submitted to the judicial committee for discussion and decision. Step 6 make a judgment. 7. Continue the court session and read the judgment. Legal basis: Article 198 of the Criminal Procedure Law. During the court hearing, all facts and evidence related to conviction and sentencing shall be investigated and debated. With the permission of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor, the parties, defenders and agents ad litem may express their opinions on the evidence and the case, and may argue with each other. After the presiding judge announces the end of the debate, the defendant has the right to make a final statement.