What are the conditions for refusing private prosecution in criminal judicial interpretation?

After the court handles the case, if the parties have objections, they can apply for private prosecution, but many people don't know what the conditions are for private prosecution if they are convicted of refusing to execute the crime in judicial interpretation. Generally speaking, there are two conditions for private prosecution of the crime of refusing to execute. One is that when the person applying for execution proves that the person who has the obligation to execute refuses to execute, private prosecution can be carried out at this time. Then, when the executor can prove his accusation, that's it. First, the judicial interpretation and conditions for private prosecution of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment? The Supreme Court issued the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Ruling Criminal Cases, which clearly stipulates that ordinary people can also protect their legitimate rights and interests through private prosecution in addition to prosecuting the crime of refusing to execute. (1) There are two conditions for private prosecution of the crime of refusing to execute: 1. If the applicant for execution has evidence to prove that the person who has the obligation to execute refuses to execute the judgment or written order and infringes upon the personal rights and property rights of the applicant for execution, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law. Specifically, the person who has the obligation to execute has the ability to execute one of the following eight acts: (1) refusing to execute after taking compulsory measures such as fines, detention, etc. because of refusing to report or lying about the property situation and violating the people's court's order to restrict high consumption and related consumption; (2) Forging or destroying important evidence about the performance ability of the person subjected to execution, preventing others from testifying or instigating, buying or coercing others to commit perjury by means of violence, threat or bribery, and preventing the people's court from finding out the property of the person subjected to execution, so that the judgment or ruling cannot be executed; (3) refusing to deliver the property and tickets determined by legal documents, or refusing to move out of the house or land, which makes the judgment or ruling unenforceable; (four) collusion with others, through false litigation, false arbitration, false settlement and other means to hinder the implementation. Causing the judgment or ruling to be unenforceable; (5) using violence or threats to prevent the person subjected to execution from entering the execution site, or gathering people to make trouble or impact the execution site, so that the execution work cannot be carried out; (6) Insulting, besieging, detaining or beating the enforcement personnel, which makes execution impossible; (7) Damaging or robbing the data of execution cases, execution vehicles and other execution equipment, clothes of execution personnel, and official certificates, which makes execution impossible; (8) Refusing to execute the judgment or ruling of the court, thus causing heavy losses to creditors. 2. If the executor has evidence to prove that he has filed a complaint, the public security organ or the people's procuratorate shall not pursue the criminal responsibility of the person who has the obligation to execute. Moreover, in the introduction of the conditions of private prosecution in the judicial interpretation of the crime of refusing to execute, it is impossible to forge or destroy evidence and instruct others to make false testimony if there are some elements such as false reports. These acts include violent acts that collude with others or hinder the execution of official duties. Once the above situation occurs, there is basically no possibility of private prosecution.