Procedural justice is more important than consequential justice, which is the cornerstone of modern legal system and the guarantee of fairness and justice. So when this case was tried, the lawyers defending old Rong Zhi were nothing more than these three situations:
1. Taking defending money as a profession, as long as business comes to you, many people will not refuse. In fact, the lawyer himself knows that the crimes committed by Lao are born to die in the end, but Lao and her family are still a little lucky, and they will definitely spend money to find a lawyer and try their best to excuse themselves and strive for a better result. In this case, only lawyers are awake. As long as there is money to make, the law allows, why not? Besides, is it possible that the defense cost of a high-profile case like Old Rong Zhi is very low? Most importantly, once the case is won, many rich people will seek legal action against him. Even if he loses, he will still get the money. Who would refuse such a thing of fame and fortune?
Second, the pursuit of the rigor and fairness of the law is pragmatic, and it is time to take responsibility and take responsibility, rather than clarifying one's own responsibilities. I believe that there are such lawyers, and if there are, it will be aboveboard. It is not ruled out that the prosecution's accusation against old Rong Zhi is different from the facts. Even if it is a heinous gangster, the law should be objective and practical, not to be missed or wronged. Of course, there should be very few lawyers who really hold this idea to defend old Rong Zhi.
Third, the lawyer appointed by the relevant state agencies If no lawyer is willing to defend Old Rong Zhi, the relevant agencies will also appoint a lawyer for her. This is to ensure the legitimate rights and interests that criminal suspects should enjoy.