Ma 'anshan criminal case, has the second-instance judgment of Cui Hua's intentional homicide case handled by lawyer Jin Hu come down? Has the second trial been changed? After half a year's trial!

Regarding the verdict of the case, the parties can inquire through the internet. If the network is inaccessible, the parties do have the right to know, and they can go to the judicial organs to inquire. According to Article 3 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Judgment Documents by People's Courts on the Internet, the following judgment documents made by people's courts shall be published on the Internet:

(1) Criminal, civil and administrative judgments;

(2) Criminal, civil, administrative and enforcement decisions;

(3) Payment orders.

(four) criminal, civil, administrative and executive dismissal notice;

(five) the state compensation decision;

(6) a written decision on compulsory medical treatment or a written decision on rejecting an application for compulsory medical treatment;

(seven) the execution of punishment and the decision to change;

(eight) the decision of detention and fine for obstructing litigation and execution, the decision to terminate detention in advance, and the reconsideration decision made against the punishment of detention and fine;

(9) Administrative mediation and civil public interest litigation mediation;

(ten) other judgment documents that have the effect of suspending or ending litigation or have an impact on the substantive rights and interests of the parties and have a significant impact on the procedural rights and interests of the parties.

Article 4 stipulates that a written judgment made by a people's court shall not be published on the Internet under any of the following circumstances:

Involving state secrets;

(2) A minor commits a crime;

(3) Closing the case through mediation or confirming the effectiveness of the people's mediation agreement, unless it is really necessary to make it public in order to protect national interests, social public interests and the legitimate rights and interests of others;

(four) divorce proceedings or involving the custody and guardianship of minor children;

(five) other circumstances that the people's court considers inappropriate to publish on the Internet.