During the reign of George III in England (1760-1820), people's enthusiasm for wearing hair covers disappeared, and hair covers were no longer popular, except for bishops, grooms and people engaged in the legal profession, judges and barristers only wore them at trials. After 1830, the bishop also took off his headband completely.
At first, judges wore shoulder-length hair covers, but after 1780, judges' hair covers had a "division of labor": small hair covers with curly hair on both sides and a small ponytail tied behind them, which were generally worn in civil cases; Traditional shoulder-length hair covers only appear in criminal trials. After 1840, long hair covers also became a part of ceremonial costumes, which were only worn in various sacrificial activities.
In 1970s, in order to comply with the trend of reducing forms and promoting harmony in family courts, wigs were abolished in Australia. But when it arrived at 1987, it was said that the wig was restored because of repeated attacks on judicial personnel.
In Britain, 1992 abolished the practice of wearing wigs for judicial personnel of juvenile special courts.
In 2007, barristers in England and Wales were granted the right "if barristers wear wigs".
Like Britain and some former British colonies, lawyers in Hong Kong are divided into junior lawyers who directly serve clients and senior lawyers who represent clients in court. It is easy to see this difference in history: barristers, like judges, wear well-made robes and hand-woven wigs.
Over the years, lawyers have continuously expanded their business scope and entered the field traditionally considered as barristers. 20 10 hong kong lawyers have obtained the right to apply for special status, with which they can represent their clients in a higher court. But barristers are still unwilling to accept more colleagues wearing curly wigs.
Subsequently, the Chief Justice of Hong Kong rejected the lawyer's request to join the wig category. Ye Lide, president of the Bar Association, said that barristers were disappointed with the ruling. Not having long hair like cauliflower makes them vulnerable to discrimination by jury members, and the jury may not take them seriously.
2 1 century, the hair covers used by British judges were much smaller than before. They are called "bench wigs" and look like rows of egg rolls tied together.
Wigs have become the symbol of lawyers, and the state has to use taxpayers' money to process and manufacture them. It takes a skilled craftsman about 44 working hours to make a wig, which is expensive. But in order to maintain the dignity of lawyers and the justice of the law, this habit has continued.