0 1, case: compensation 1.59 million! Zhang Moumou v XX hospital: a case of secondary disability caused by cerebral infarction after carotid endarterectomy.
CaseNo.: (20 18) Jing 0 105 Early Republic of China 44590
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: equal responsibility, 55% judgment.
Compensation amount: 1.59 million yuan.
This case lasted for more than two years. After communicating with the judge many times, the lawyer applied for the appraiser to appear in court and wrote back, actively fighting for it. In the end, the defendant's hospital was judged to compensate 6.5438+0.59 million yuan according to the responsibility ratio of 55%. This case is the highest compensation case in 2020.
Link: Zhang Moumou v XX hospital: case of secondary disability caused by cerebral infarction after carotid endarterectomy.
02. Case: failure rate 100%! Choledochal injury caused by cholecystectomy 1 case
CaseNo.: (20 19) Jing 0 105 Early Republic of China 66728
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: all responsibilities shall be judged according to the ratio of 100%.
Compensation amount: 530,000 yuan.
After the statement and analysis of professional medical lawyers, the appraisal institution adopted the lawyer's statement and found that the defendant was fully responsible, and the court ruled according to the responsibility ratio of 100%.
03. Case: Zhao v. A Hospital and B Hospital, the case of blindness in the right eye caused by optic nerve injury caused by eye trauma surgery.
CaseNo.: (2020) Lu 0 102 Early Republic of China 1650 1
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: A hospital bears less responsibility, while B hospital bears greater responsibility.
Compensation amount: more than 200,000 yuan.
In this case, the lawyer actively communicated with the mediation judge and the parties. Before entering the proceedings, the mediation was successful, and the parties immediately received compensation, which saved worry, time and money.
Link: Zhao v. A Hospital and B Hospital: case of blindness in the right eye due to optic nerve injury caused by eye trauma surgery.
04. Case: Support all medical expenses! Small intestinal fistula resection after colon cancer surgery 2625px!
CaseNo.: (2020) Lu 0 102 Early Republic of China 16266
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Proportion of responsibility: secondary responsibility, with a judgment of 35%.
Compensation amount: 330,000 yuan.
Most courts bear the personal burden of medical expenses in proportion to the fault. In this case, after lawyers searched a large number of cases and submitted relevant laws and regulations, the court finally adopted the opinions of attorneys and supported the hospital to compensate all medical expenses. The parties are very satisfied with the verdict.
Link: Support all medical expenses! Small intestinal fistula resection after colon cancer surgery 2625px!
05. Case: The hospital is mainly responsible for the uterine rupture and bleeding during delivery, with expert advice attached. Awesome!
CaseNo.: (20 19) Nei0626 Early Republic of China 1307
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Proportion of responsibility: the main responsibility is to settle the case through mediation.
Compensation amount: more than 550,000 yuan.
This case was appraised in the Judicial Appraisal Center of Suzhou University. Through the professional statement of the attorney, the appraisal institution adopted the opinions of all lawyers, and finally identified it as the main responsibility. After mediation by the court, the parties received compensation of 550,000 yuan. The lawyer's professionalism and serious and responsible attitude are highly praised by the parties. In the words of the parties, "You are famous in Ordos!"
Link: The hospital is mainly responsible for the uterine rupture and massive bleeding during childbirth, with expert advice attached. Awesome!
06. Case: Li Moumou v. XX Hospital for the death of acute cerebral infarction and cerebral hernia after cholecystectomy.
CaseNo.: (20 19) Nei0104 Minchu 262 1
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: equal responsibility, 50% judgment.
Compensation amount: 430,000 yuan.
In the absence of an autopsy report, this case was accepted by the Shanghai Forensic Appraisal Institute, and it was not easy to be finally recognized as joint liability.
Link: Li moumou v XX hospital: death case of acute cerebral infarction and cerebral hernia after cholecystectomy.
07. Case: Liu Moumou v. XX Hospital for hemorrhagic shock death caused by hysterectomy.
CaseNo.: (2020) Lu 0502 Early Republic of China 7 13
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: equal responsibility, 50% judgment.
Compensation amount: more than 500,000 yuan.
Through professional analysis, the patient's attorney overturned the defendant's analysis of the cause of death, and finally the appraisal agency adopted the patient's lawyer's statement and assessed it as equal responsibility. This case also supports all the medical expenses claimed by the plaintiff!
Link: Liu moumou v XX hospital for the death case of hemorrhagic shock caused by hysterectomy.
08. Case: Jiang Moumou v. XX Hospital for the death of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by pituitary adenoma resection.
Case number: (20 19) Jing 0 108, early Republic of China 5805 1.
(2020) Beijing 0 1 Zhong Min 17 15
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: secondary responsibility, 30% judgment.
Compensation amount: more than 550,000 yuan.
The patient in this case is a rural hukou. After understanding the patient's work, the lawyer applied for a witness to appear in court and submitted relevant evidence to prove that the patient lived and worked in the town. The court adopted the lawyer's opinion and decided according to the town standard.
Link: Jiang moumou v XX hospital pituitary adenoma resection caused by cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, subarachnoid hemorrhage death.
09. Case: Zhou Moumou v. A Hospital and B Hospital. The case of facial nerve schwannoma caused by parotidectomy was misdiagnosed as facial nerve injury, facial paralysis and hearing impairment.
Case number: (20 18) Jing 01kloc-0/Republic of China 12807.
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Responsibility ratio: A hospital bears secondary responsibility, and B hospital bears secondary responsibility+equal responsibility.
Compensation amount: A hospital compensated more than 200,000 yuan, and B hospital compensated 1.5 million yuan.
This case is the second neurilemmoma case represented by the patient's lawyer. After his professional statement and applying for an appraiser to appear in court, the appraiser affirmed the questions raised by the attorney, and finally the court ruled that the two hospitals compensated the plaintiff for more than 300 thousand yuan.
Links: Zhou Moumou v. A Hospital and B Hospital: The case of facial nerve schwannoma misdiagnosed as facial nerve injury, facial paralysis and hearing impairment caused by parotidectomy.
10, cause of action: Guo moumou v. left limb hemiplegia caused by cerebral hemorrhage after stent implantation of intracranial artery stenosis in XX Hospital.
CaseNo.: (2020) Lu 0 102 Early Republic of China 16266
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Proportion of responsibility: secondary responsibility, mediation.
Compensation amount: 490,000 yuan.
The case was analyzed and communicated by professional medical dispute lawyers. Under the auspices of the court, both doctors and patients successfully mediated, and the doctor compensated 490,000 yuan for medical expenses, nursing expenses and disability compensation.
Link: Guo moumou v XX hospital case of left limb hemiplegia caused by cerebral hemorrhage after intracranial artery stenosis stent implantation.
1 1. Case: Zheng Moumou v. XX Hospital for compensation for disability caused by intracranial hemorrhage after intracranial electrode implantation 7 10000.
CaseNo.: (20 19) Jing 0 105 Early Republic of China 76958
Attorney: Lu Xiaoyan.
Proportion of responsibilities: secondary to secondary responsibilities
Compensation amount: 7 1. 1 more than ten thousand yuan.
In this case, the patient is an adult, but after the operation, his left limb is hemiplegic, his memory is confused and he can't take care of himself. The lawyer initially identified him as a person with limited capacity for civil conduct. In this case, he needs to be recognized as a person with limited capacity for civil conduct through special procedures of the court, and his guardian can be appointed before other proceedings such as medical disputes can be conducted.
Legal basis:
Regulations on the handling of medical accidents
Article 46 Civil liability disputes such as medical malpractice compensation can be resolved through consultation between doctors and patients. Unwilling to negotiate or if negotiation fails, the parties may apply to the administrative department of health for mediation, or directly bring a civil lawsuit to the people's court.
Article 47 If both parties settle civil liability disputes such as medical malpractice compensation through consultation, they shall reach an agreement. The agreement shall specify the basic information of both parties, the cause of the medical accident, the level of medical accident recognized by both parties and the amount of compensation determined through consultation, and shall be signed by both parties.