If the people's court has approved the postponement of evidence collection, but due to objective reasons the evidence cannot be provided within the permitted time limit, and failure to hold a trial may cause the judgment to be unfair, new evidence provided by the parties may be considered.
Legal Consequences of Introducing "New Evidence" In addition to the corresponding impact on the case itself, the introduction of "new evidence" will also have the following two consequences according to the evidence regulations: 1. Because the parties are not present Providing evidence within the prescribed time limit results in the case being remanded for retrial or revised by new evidence brought forward by the people's court during the second instance or retrial, and the original judgment does not constitute an erroneous case. 2. If one party requests (new evidence) that the other party bear the direct losses expanded due to increased travel expenses, lost work expenses, witness appearance fees, litigation costs and other reasonable expenses, the People's Court shall support it. I believe you already have a certain understanding of the issues about new evidence that the editor has introduced to you. I would like to remind everyone that evidence is very important when handling a case, so everyone must collect it and keep it well. If there is anything you don’t understand when handling a case, it is best to ask a lawyer for help. This will make your case handling more effective and professional.