How can lawyers improve their sensitivity as lawyers?

This problem will not only be encountered by lawyers, but also by people engaged in legal work. For example, the trial of criminal cases will test lawyers, judges and prosecutors, and even prosecutors and judges are more than lawyers. After all, the prosecutor's basic views and main evidence have been mastered by lawyers before the trial, and the arguments in the lawyer's trial are only mastered by lawyers themselves, which is relatively sudden and explosive. Not all litigation knowledge points will be mastered, even excellent prosecutors and judges with profound legal knowledge and extensive experience. I remember listening in on a criminal case. During the court investigation, the defense lawyer casually asked the defendant several questions. The main idea of this question is not obvious. The prosecutor probably didn't care at the time, but the presiding judge had an insight into his intentions. Therefore, in the second round of court debate, the presiding judge specially reminded the defender that the purpose of asking questions was to prove the plot of the defendant's attempt or suspension or other plots, and hoped that the defender would make it clear in legal terms and let the prosecution and the defense debate this point. Therefore, legal sensitivity must first have a basic knowledge of law, plus rich practical experience and social experience, plus their own thinking. In the words of Jin Yong's martial arts novels, it is to achieve the purpose of getting through the second pulse of Ren Du. We can learn from this point, that is, when dealing with civil and commercial cases, we will not be at a loss and make jokes when we encounter administrative litigation and criminal problems. The topic is easy to say, but it is not so easy to reach a certain level, and it takes time to hone.