Demonstration paper on criminal request for commutation

Hello, my answer to the question of "model essay on commutation" is as follows: Appellant: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, male, born in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. He was arrested on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ District Court made an appeal on suspicion of intentional robbery. Appeal request: request the court of second instance to cancel the judgment of first instance, find out the facts of the case, and change the appellant's criminal responsibility of commutation or probation. Facts and reasons: The court of first instance failed to adapt the crime to the punishment according to the facts, nature and circumstances of the crime and the degree of harm to society, and did not fully consider the appellant's discretionary sentencing circumstances such as lighter or mitigated punishment. The appellant's sentence is too heavy and should be reduced. 1. The appellant is less subjective and vicious, has no objection to the criminal process of this case, is willing to accept legal punishment, is responsible for his own actions, and has a good performance of pleading guilty and repenting, which belongs to voluntary confession. According to the provisions of Article 9 of Several Opinions on the Application of Ordinary Procedures to the Trial of Defendants' Pleading Cases, the people's court shall, as appropriate, give a lighter punishment to defendants who voluntarily plead guilty. According to Article 18 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Guangxi Higher People's Court's Guiding Opinions on Sentencing of People's Courts, if a person voluntarily pleads guilty in court, the benchmark punishment may be reduced below 10% according to the nature of the crime, the seriousness of the crime, the degree of confession and the performance of repentance. 2. After the robbery, the appellant instinctively fled or resisted, but did not reach the level of resisting arrest, or used violence or threatened violence on the spot. Although the case changed from robbery to robbery, it was completely different from robbery in essence. The appellant did not carry and use a knife at the scene, and violently attacked the victim, which caused obviously low social harm. Combined with the fact that the appellant is a first-time offender, he has always performed well and has no other criminal record. He broke the law only because he was ignorant at the instigation and instigation of his friends, not a recidivist. Through this crime, the appellant has deeply realized his mistake. In order to punish and educate 1/4 (final version), the appellant should be given a chance to turn over a new leaf. 3. The robbed mobile phone has been recovered by the public security organ and returned to the victim. According to the third paragraph of Article 20 of the Implementation Rules for the Guiding Opinions on Sentencing of People's Courts (for Trial Implementation) issued by Guangxi Higher People's Court with the assessed value of RMB _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, if the victim has not suffered economic losses or the losses are small, the benchmark penalty can be reduced by less than 10%. The appellant's family has communicated with the victim on this matter, hoping to get further understanding from the victim. Whether the understanding is successful or not will not affect the appellant's good attitude of repentance. At the same time, according to the provisions of Article 22 of the Implementation Rules of Guangxi Higher People's Court on Guiding Opinions on Sentencing of People's Courts (Trial), if the victim or his family expresses understanding, the basic punishment can be reduced by 20% considering the nature of the crime, the severity of the crime, the reasons for understanding and the degree of confession and repentance. 4. The appellant was convicted of robbery at first instance, sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of _ _ _ _ years and fined RMB 10,000. The appellant has no objection to the fine, and his family members are willing to pay the fine themselves, and hope that the appellant can return to society as soon as possible. The appellant promised not to harm the society, make a good reform and start a new life. We implore the court of second instance to fully consider the seriousness of the appellant's crime and combine the facts, nature and circumstances of the crime. According to the provisions of Article 72 of the Criminal Law, for criminals sentenced to criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, if the application of probation does not really harm society according to the criminal's criminal circumstances and penitence, the provisions of probation can be declared. To sum up, the court of first instance gave the appellant a heavier sentence, and urged the court of second instance to cancel the judgment of first instance, find out the facts of the case, and commute the appellant's criminal responsibility into a commutation or probation according to law. The appellant in this case is the appellee _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.