Lawyers need to pay attention to what problems in criminal defense?

1, carefully read the case materials found valuable defense points public security, inspection organs sent to the court prosecution materials, not all are flawless. In practice, I have encountered such as numerical calculation method is not correct, the calculation results are not correct, contradictions between the witness testimony and so on. Careful discovery and utilization of these flaws in the prosecution materials can effectively influence the court's consideration of a suspect. Discovering the flaws is not an easy task, and it requires patience to read a large amount of litigation materials and analyze whether the logic and calculation methods followed in the materials are correct, especially important in criminal cases of embezzlement and acceptance of bribes, as the figures involved directly determine the length of the sentence imposed on the suspect. In the court accurately use the public security, inspectors work flaws, can make the defense to achieve twice the result with half the effort. 2, timely communication with the judge and inspectors, find favorable evidence in time to apply for the collection or notarized collection of lawyers in the prosecution and the judge and the prosecutor's communication is very necessary, you can pass their understanding of the case to the judge and the prosecutor to a certain extent, affecting their way of thinking. Of course, and the judge, the prosecutor's communication to seek ways and strategies, can communicate face to face to communicate, can't communicate face to face should be written form of their own views to them, but don't disclose to them the flaws they found. By reading the case file, communicating with the judge and the prosecutor, as well as communicating with them, new clues to the evidence in favor of the defendant may be discovered. It is then the attorney's responsibility to ask the court or prosecutor to take them. In the judge or prosecutor and the lawyer in the collection of evidence on the disagreement, and the evidence is indeed favorable to the defendant, the lawyer can take the method of notarized deposition, request a notary public notarization of the lawyer's collection of evidence, to guard against the risk of lawyers in the collection of evidence. Never pay attention to, the lawyer must not take the risk of taking evidence. 3, before the court designed to the defense and witnesses questions and order, in the court when adjusted, and was allowed to ask questions fully. It is very important to design the court to ask questions, the question design can be good to move the court personnel, so that the defense has no aversion, and even affect the potential position of the trial staff. The design of the questioning should focus on revealing the defendant has a criminal motive, criminal motivation for the formation of the deeper causes of the subjective aspects of the crime. In the courtroom, lawyers should adjust the order of questioning according to the specific situation and adopt an infectious way of asking questions to lay the foundation for the court debate. China's criminal trial in the implementation of a major principle is subjective and objective, so in a clear case, the subjective aspects of the crime is very important, if can prove that the defendant's subjective aspects of the near good non-evil, will have an impact on the outcome of the trial. 4, the court debate, lawyers should choose the key point of defense to make a breakthrough, must not be masked to the point. In the court debate, lawyers should give full play to one or two key issues, seize the flaws in the prosecution materials, especially the use of contradictions between the witness testimony, negative evidence against the defendant. As lawyers are more aware of the legal norms, understand how to be more beneficial to the parties, so in criminal, civil and even litigation cases, the general parties will hire lawyers to deal with related matters. If the lawyer accepts the case of arbitrary charges, if the party can provide relevant evidence, then you can also hold the evidence to the local judicial organs.