First of all, the specific performance of the Syrian regional court's ineffective law enforcement.
In Xuzhou area, some cases encountered various non-execution behaviors of the court in the process of execution. The specific performance is as follows:
The execution procedure is not standardized: the court did not strictly follow the legal procedures when executing the case. If the specified time node is not met, the case will be delayed for a long time and the rights and interests of the parties will be affected.
Poor enforcement: During the enforcement process, the court failed to investigate and implement the property of the person subjected to execution, resulting in poor enforcement effect and unable to effectively protect the rights and interests of the parties.
Dereliction of duty by the executed person: Some executed persons have problems such as incorrect working attitude and weak sense of responsibility, which leads to omissions and mistakes in execution, further aggravating the difficulty in execution.
Second, the consequences of not enforcing the law.
The weak enforcement of law by Xuzhou District Court has brought great troubles and losses to the parties concerned. On the one hand, the legitimate rights and interests of the parties can not be guaranteed in time and effectively, which leads to their long-term involvement in disputes and lawsuits; On the other hand, lax law enforcement has also damaged the credibility and image of the court and affected judicial justice and authority.
Third, it calls for strengthening supervision and improvement.
In view of the ineffective enforcement of law by Syrian courts, we call on relevant departments to strengthen supervision and management to ensure that courts can strictly abide by legal procedures and regulations when executing cases. At the same time, the court itself should also strengthen internal management and training, improve the professional quality and professional ethics of executives, and ensure the quality and efficiency of implementation.
To sum up:
The poor execution of Xuzhou District Court is manifested in some specific problems, such as irregular execution procedures, poor execution, dereliction of duty and so on, which has brought great trouble and loss to the parties and damaged the credibility and image of the court. We call on the relevant departments to strengthen supervision and management, and the courts themselves should strengthen internal management and training to ensure the quality and efficiency of implementation.
Legal basis:
People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law
Article 224 provides that:
Legally effective civil judgments and rulings, as well as the property part of criminal judgments and rulings, shall be executed by the people's court of first instance or the people's court of the place where the property is executed at the same level as the people's court of first instance.
People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law
Article 225 stipulates that:
If the parties or interested parties think that the enforcement act violates the law, they may file a written objection to the court in charge of enforcement. If a party or interested party raises a written objection, the people's court shall conduct an examination within 15 days from the date of receiving the written objection. If the reason is established, it shall make a ruling to cancel or correct it; If the reason cannot be established, the ruling shall be rejected. If a party or interested party refuses to accept the award, it may apply to the people's court at the next higher level for reconsideration within ten days from the date of service of the award.