A man in Shanxi died six years ago and still receives a pension. The son responded: Is it wrong to pay off the debts for his father?

What an ignorant person it is to ask such an ignorant question. Although I am not a lawyer, I can tell you with great certainty that it was a mistake, and it was a big mistake!

Pension is the basic living guarantee provided by the state for the elderly who can't work with young people to earn income. The money is paid from taxes and fees collected by the state. The old man still receives the money after his death, which is tantamount to cheating money. If the amount is large, it is fraud, understand!

Please click to enter the picture description (maximum 18 words).

1. M: What's wrong with me using my dad's pension to pay off the debts he owed before seeing a doctor? When I watched the news, I guessed why this man used the money to pay off his debts. I guess it was his idea. This pension belongs to his father, and the state pays it on time every month. His father owed a lot of money to his family because of illness. At first, his father was ill and didn't owe much money. Their family can afford it only by scrimping and saving, but in the later period, their illness became more and more serious and they borrowed more money.

I just thought about the pension my father received. Anyway, the money was given to him by the state. It is no problem to give him a life. It's no problem to pay off the debts he owes for medical treatment. Anyway, the money was not spent elsewhere, but on old talents. Even if the country knows, it's okay, but! If the old man is still alive, it's all right, but now that the old man is dead, it's illegal.

Please click to enter the picture description (maximum 18 words).

Second, the pension is to ensure the living standard of the living, not to pay off the debts of the family. Why do pensions exist? Have you checked? Pension actually means pension. According to the regulations of the state, after workers are old or lose their ability to work, the state will classify them according to their contribution to society, and pay certain monthly treatment according to different qualifications and conditions to ensure that they can still meet their basic living needs when they are old.

The most straightforward meaning of this statement is that the elderly can get it as long as they are alive, but as long as they die, the state will no longer bear the basic needs of the elderly family, and any other things about the debts of the elderly will no longer be responsible. Moreover, with the continuous decline in China's fertility rate in recent years, the life expectancy of the elderly has been extended, and the national pension has been unable to make ends meet. At this time, some people will use the money to repay their debts to their families. Is this brain damage? This money is for the elderly to settle down, not for other purposes.

Please click to enter the picture description (maximum 18 words).

Third, it is suggested that the funeral and social security departments should be networked in the future to prevent someone from taking advantage of the loopholes. Personally, I suggest that the funeral department and the social security department can set up a system of enjoying * * *. For example, contemporary people should be sent to the crematorium after death, and at the same time, they should go through the relevant procedures with the death certificate issued by the hospital. After receiving this information, the crematorium can directly enter it into the system. After seeing this information, the social security department can make corresponding judgments. It doesn't matter if people's funeral lasts for a month, but as long as it exceeds the system that the old man dies for one month.

In this way, even if someone wants to take advantage of the country, they can save a lot of money, and the people mentioned in the news have been dead for a long time and their pensions are still being collected.

Finally: I read on the news that this man received almost 200,000 yuan. This man is bold enough, and no one around him actually advised him?