The guilty verdict in criminal cases is based on several basic principles of criminal justice. This case, which was regarded as Simpson's condemnation in the United States at that time, was very classic, not because Simpson was a villain who escaped legal punishment, but because it reflected the high pursuit of procedural legitimacy in the British and American criminal justice systems. It also reflects the height of the rule of law in the United States. No citizen can be convicted by criminal justice under reasonable doubt. There is evidence in Simpson's case, but due to the illegal procedures in obtaining evidence, several key evidences are directly polluted and directly excluded. There is also a key issue in this case, which involves the racist tendency of American society. Simpson's defense lawyers used this to help Simpson win the support of colored Americans and juries.
On the civil side, because the United States adopts the criminal and civil dichotomy, whether Simpson's injury behavior caused compensation in civil cases will have another set of proof standards, which is much lower than that in criminal cases. According to which standard Simpson can be judged guilty and need to bear civil liability for compensation, but this matter is no longer handled, the crime is over and can not be convicted again.
In fact, whether he killed Nicole or not is still a mystery to me. .
In fact, the key point is that in American society, no one needs to worry about the arrest and criminal trial by judicial organs without evidence and legal procedures, because criminal judicial power is always the most severe power in public power, and its use and operation should have strict procedural standards to eliminate all doubts about rationality. Many judicial criminal justice principles in the United States reflect the high judicial level and advanced ideas of their country. It will be a safer society, and at least the rule of law will gain people's trust and security.
When politics is not credible, people are glad to have religion.
When religion is not credible, people finally have the rule of law.