Does the losing party have to bear the lawyer's fees of the other party?

Not all cases require the losing party to bear the lawyer's fee. In some legal cases, the losing party must bear the lawyer's fees of the other party.

Travel expenses, printing expenses, transportation and communication expenses, investigation and evidence collection expenses and other necessary handling expenses required by legal aid personnel to handle legal aid cases. If the claim includes the donee, the court may award it to the losing party who is not the donee according to the specific circumstances. The scope of revocation right is limited to creditor's rights. The necessary expenses for the creditor to exercise its right of cancellation shall be borne by the debtor.

Consequences of losing the case

First, the legal fees paid by the plaintiff in advance shall be borne by the plaintiff himself, which is different from the legal fees paid by the defendant after winning the case.

Second, the litigation costs are also borne by the plaintiff, such as judicial expertise fees. Winning the case can be decided by the defendant and borne by the plaintiff himself.

Third, before the lawsuit, there was a similar agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant that "the lawyer's agency fee paid to realize the creditor's rights shall be borne by the defendant", and it was also borne by the plaintiff himself because of losing the lawsuit.

Fourth, the most important thing is that the purpose of being willing to sue is to safeguard one's legitimate rights and interests through litigation and legal protection. Because of losing the case, the court did not support it, and the purpose of the lawsuit could not be achieved.

Reasons why the losing party must bear the lawyer's fees of the other party.

1, the law of our country does not clearly stipulate the principle of bearing the lawyer's agency fee. If the court decides that one party's lawyer's agency fee shall be borne by the other party, there is no legal basis.

2. According to Article 58 of China's Civil Procedure Law, the parties may entrust one or two lawyers as agents ad litem to participate in the litigation. Thus, it is not legal to entrust a lawyer to represent civil litigation, but voluntary. Whether to entrust a lawyer to represent civil litigation depends on the wishes of the parties themselves. Therefore, the lawyer's agency fee arising from asking a lawyer to provide legal services should be borne by me.

3. The legal service itself means that whoever needs this service will bear the corresponding expenses.

The claim for lawyer's agency fee does not belong to the scope of court acceptance. The reason is that the law of our country does not clearly stipulate the commitment of lawyer's agency fee. It is precisely because the law does not clearly stipulate that in the trial practice, the court will not support or handle the litigation request of the parties asking the other party to bear the lawyer's agency fee. Only when the law clearly stipulates that the court can make a judgment according to law.