I don't know if you watch American court movies. Jurors in America are very powerful. It is up to them whether they are guilty or not. Therefore, who constitutes the jury is one of the focuses of controversy between the prosecution and the defense. Criminal defense in the United States is very developed, and lawyers have done a lot of research on it. For example, the defense usually likes such jurors, middle class and intellectuals, who come from the university district. These people are usually more sympathetic in the face of judgment.
Simply put, people who have a better life tend to cherish their own lives, and cherishing themselves often leads to cherishing others. As long as they don't conflict, they often show what is usually called "kindness". On the contrary, people with poor lives usually have greater grievances, and people in the lower classes tend to hold more conservative and strict moral values.
The monitor is the same anyway. I would rather bear the arrogance of the rich (arrogance is their own business, not mine) than contact. . . . . . If you don't say it, you will be scolded.