Why are women sentenced for reporting environmental problems in their hometown? Is there room to turn around?

Li Sixia was originally an engineer in a state-owned enterprise in Shaanxi Province. He witnessed the unlicensed mining of two stone factories in Shuangxi Village, Shiquan County, Ankang City, Shaanxi Province, which damaged roads and polluted the environment. With chivalrous heart, he claimed compensation from the relevant stone factory on behalf of the villagers.

Over the years, Li has been accusing the stone factory of disturbing the people and disturbing social order by posting and reporting on the Internet. ?

Later, Li Yin was arrested by the police of Shiquan County Procuratorate on suspicion of stirring up trouble, and was arrested by Shiquan County Procuratorate in the same year. At that time, the public prosecution agency believed that the report of Li and others was exaggerated and slandered, and the inconvenience of villagers' travel was due to restrictions and wide docks. Accusing three people constitutes a joint crime. At that time, among the seven charges of Li Jiefang, there were also criminal acts such as asking villagers for tolls and refusing to refund the land acquisition fee of 6.5438+0 million yuan. And sentenced Li to two and a half years in prison. Li and others appealed against the verdict.

Later, according to xiaoxiang morning herald reporter, after the first-instance judgment was announced, Li refused to accept the appeal, and Li's attorney continued to defend her innocence.

At present, the second trial of this case has ended, and Li has also received a criminal ruling from the Intermediate People's Court of Ankang City. The Ankang Intermediate People's Court held that the original judgment found that the facts were unclear and the evidence was insufficient, which violated the procedural ruling in the trial of the case, revoked the criminal judgment of the first instance and sent it back for retrial. ?

Li said frankly that although the household registration is not in Shuangxi Village, as the first college student in the village to go out, she has the obligation to participate in safeguarding rights because the house in the village was destroyed. Like she said? Fallen leaves return to their roots. Wherever I go, I come from there. .

Others advised her not to meddle, but she said she couldn't sit idly by.

? I understand how difficult it is for villagers to build this road. Generations of people dug it out with hoes, and now it has been crushed after walking for a year, which is very sad. Now this road has changed from a good road to a bean curd residue road, and it is full of smoke and dust, so we can't ignore it. ? Now, the Li case has made the latest progress. ?

After hearing the case, the Intermediate People's Court of Ankang City revoked the criminal judgment of the first instance and sent it back to the Shiquan County People's Court for retrial. 14 In August, the People's Procuratorate of Shiquan County requested the Shiquan County Court to withdraw the prosecution on the grounds that it did not meet the conditions for prosecution. The court allowed the procuratorate to withdraw the charges against Li and others. ?

In the face of such good news, Li and other three defense lawyers told the upstream journalists. They are completely innocent, and there is one last step. ? ?

At present, after the Shiquan court made a ruling allowing the withdrawal of the prosecution, the case returned to the procuratorial stage. According to the law, the procuratorate should make a decision not to prosecute within one month. As long as the procuratorate decides not to prosecute, it means that Li and others will be completely innocent. After the decision of the procuratorate not to prosecute, Li and others can apply for state compensation.

We believe that justice, though long overdue, will not come. The world will certainly give Li justice and let the sunshine of justice shine on the earth.